The Phenomenon of Civil Dispute Claim Settlement through Police Report a Restorative Justice Approach

Stephan Anggita Hutagaol, Abdul Muta'ali, Basir S, Agus Ady Wijaya, Markus Marselinus Soge

Abstract


This research was initiated by the phenomenon of civil disputes which were reported to the police, so what was originally civil disputes became criminal domain. The principle of restorative justice is a breakthrough in the criminal legal system seeks to provide justice to the parties (especially to the victims) by prioritizing recovery to its original state (before crime happened) and restore good relationship in the society, instead in factual (das sein) restorative justice was used to resolve civil cases such as account receivable claim or bad debt through police reports, which theoretically (das sollen) account receivable claim or bad debt should be resolved through the mechanism of civil law proceedings. The author chooses qualitative research method type of document study (literature study) using primary data and secondary data as sources of data in this study, including examining police regulations and restorative justice books written by police writers, police practitioners who are also academics, to understand the problems and to answer the research questions, as well as to achieve the research objectives. From this research the authors found that there is privilege in using criminal approach that was not found in the civil law proceedings, and by using the principle of restorative justice it is more possible for the parties to reconcile in a criminal case.


Keywords


restorative justice; police report; criminal; civil; claim

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arato, J. (2019). The private law critique of international investment law. American Journal of International Law, 3(11), 1–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.96

D’Souza, A., Weitzer, R., & Brunson, R. K. (2019). Federal investigations of police misconduct: A multi-city comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change, 7(5), 461–482.

Goodrum, A. (2021). Meeting the McGirt Moment: The Five Tribes, Sovereignty & Criminal Jurisdiction in Oklahoma’s New Indian Country. Am. Indian L. Rev., 4(6), 201–220.

Kanner, S. L., Rosen, D., Zohar, Y., & Alberstein, M. (2019). Managerial judicial conflict resolution (JCR) of plea bargaining: Shadows of law and conflict resolution. New Criminal Law Review, 2(4), 494–541.

Krismen, Y. (2019). Call For Notary To Testify Before The Court In A Litigation Cases Under Indonesian Notarial Act And Penal Law. Acta DiurnaL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(1), 170–188.

Paganelli, M. P., & Simon, F. (2022). Crime and Punishment: Adam Smith’s Theory of Sentimental Law and Economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 4(2), 268–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837220000437

Ramadhani, R., & Lubis, U. S. (2021). The Function of the Delimitation Contradictory Principle in the Settlement of Land Plot Boundary Disputes. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), 2(3), 136–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v2i3.142

Resnik, J., Amin, H., Angelis, S., Hauptman, M., Kokotailo, L., & Mehta, A. (2020). Punishment in Prison: Constituting the" Normal" and the" Atypical" in Solitary and Other Forms of Confinement. Nw. UL Rev., 2(3), 45–58.

Shah, M. M., et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). Volume 3, No 1, Page: 276-286

Whincop, M. J., Keyes, M., & Posner, R. (2018). Policy and Pragmatism in the Conflict of Laws. Routledge.

Wu, K.-J., Chen, Y.-W., Chou, C.-C., Tseng, C.-F., Su, F.-Y., & Kuo, M. Y. P. (2022). Court decisions in criminal proceedings for dental malpractice in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 2(5), 903–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2021.09.023

Zulyadi, R. (2020). Police’s Role in Investigation Process of Fraud Criminal Act of Civil Servants Candidate (Case Study of Police Station Binjai). Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 2(2), 403–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v2i2.238




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6411

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 89 times
PDF - 25 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.