Limitations of Authority the Prosecutor as Investigators in Taping on the Criminal act of Corruption

Juben MS Sagala, Azis Budianto

Abstract


This study aims: (1) To find out the authority of the prosecutor as an investigator in wiretapping cases of criminal acts of corruption (2) To find out what are the obstacles for prosecutors in wiretapping cases of criminal acts of corruption. Researchers conducted research using an empirical normative approach, namely examining the implementation of written law in social life relations. Sources of data used in this study are primary data and secondary data. Methods of collecting data utilizing interviews (interviews) and literature/document studies. The data analysis method used in this research is qualitative analysis. The results of this study are expected to increase legal knowledge for students, academics, practitioners, and the public in general as well as researchers in particular regarding the prosecutor's more limited authority in the use of wiretapping devices, to conduct wiretapping must be approved by the court and the existence of other institutions authorized in the process of investigating corruption crime.


Keywords


authority of the prosecutor to conduct wiretapping; corruption cases; criminal

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulkadir Muhamad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Ahmad Harmaen, “‘Kewenangan Jaksa Sebagai Penyidik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,’” J. Huk. Pidana Indones., 2013.

Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, “‘Korupsi, Konspirasi dan Keadilan di Indonesia,’” J. Dictum LeIP, 2002.

Hwian Christianto, “‘Tindakan Penyadapan Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana,’” J. Huk. Prioris, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016.

J. D. W. Hutapea, “Tugas dan Wewenang Jaksa dalam Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” J. Lex Crim., vol. 6, no. 2, 2017.

Jimly Asshidiqie dan Ali Safa’at, Teori Hans Kelsesn tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Sekjen dan Kepaniteraan MK-RI, 2006.

Muhammad Insa Ansari dan Indra Kesuma Hadi, “‘Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Kewenangan Jaksa di Bidang Perdata dan Tata Usaha Negara,’” Kanun J. Ilmu Huk., 2013.

Pratiwi, P.F.P., Suprayitno, and Triyani. (2020). Existence of Customary Law through Comparative Education between Dayak Ngaju Customary Law and National Law. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (2): 712-717.

Purba, I.G., and Syahrin, A. (2019). Demand against Law and Using Authority in Corruption Criminal Action. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (4): 194-206.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Compas, 2007.

S. S. dan Sri and Mamudi, Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali, 1986.

Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, 3rd ed. Jakarta: UI Press, 2007.

“Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Pasal 1 angka 2.” .

“Ibid., Pasal 1 angka 1.” .

“1Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Teknis Penyadapan Terhadap Informasi, Pasal 1 Butir 7.” .

“Ibid., Pasal 1 Butir 9.” .

“Tim Penulis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Buku Panduan Penulisan Skripsi, Tegal: Fakultas Hukum, 2019, hlm. 3.” .

Tumanggor, F., Muazzul, and Zulyadi, R. (2019). Handling of Narcotics Child Victims in Child Special Coaching Institutions Class I Tanjung Gusta, Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (4): 50-55.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6595

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 10 times
PDF - 17 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.