_.gif)
_.gif)
Communication Strategy of Facilitators in Independent Housing Stimulant Assistance Program
Abstract
This study reveals all stages of the communication strategy by facilitators in community assistance in the Self-help Housing Stimulant Assistance Program (BSPS). Because the number of uninhabitable houses in Indonesia is still quite a lot, especially the location of many residents' houses in the ring of fire route, this research was conducted with a qualitative approach to understand the facilitators in the BSPS Program. Researchers tried to obtain information by interviewing and describing the documentation and then analyzing the data obtained. In analyzing each stage of the communication strategy described above, the researcher uses Laswell's theory, namely looking at the communicator, message, media, communicant and impact aspects. The aim is to find out every detail of the aspect that affects the communication process carried out by the facilitator in the BSPS Program. In carrying out the socialization carried out by the facilitator to the community, especially the beneficiaries, was carried out following the stages of the program, with direct community involvement at each stage as one of the community empowerment activities. However, it had not been supported in terms of the media used by the facilitator, considering that the program audience was low-income and many people. The elderly. This is because the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing in the BSPS program does not yet have a comprehensive and integrated communication strategy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baqutayan, SM, Ariffin, AS, & Raji, F. (2015). Describing the Need for Affordable Livable Sustainable Housing Based on Maslow's Theory of Need. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 6 (3), 353-357. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s2p353.
Coley, RL, Leventhal, T., Lynch, AD, & Kull, M. (2013). Relations between Housing Characteristics and the Well-Being of Low-Income Children and Adolescents. Dev Psychol, Vol. 49 (9), 1775-1789. DOI: 10.1037/a0031033.
Durst, NJ, & Cangelosi, EJ (2021). Self-help housing and DIY home improvements: evidence from the American Housing Survey. Housing Studies, Vol. 36 (8), 1231-1249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1759514.
Foye, C. (2017). The Relationship Between Size of Living Space and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 18 , 427-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9732-2.
Greve, B. (2008). What is Welfare. Central European Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 2 (1), 50-73.
Guillen-Royo, M. (2014). Human Needs. In A. Michalos, (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 3027-3030). Dordrecht: Springer.
Handel, A. (2019). What's in a home? Toward a critical theory of housing/dwelling. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, Vol. 37 (6), 1045-1062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418819104.
Melo, P., & Alves, O. (2019). Community Empowerment and Community Partnerships in Nursing Decision-Making. Healthcare (Basel), Vol. 7 (2), DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7020076.
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, Vol. 5 (1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531.
Moore, JE, Mascarenhas, A., Bain, J., & Straus, SE (2017). Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability. Implementation Science, Vol. 12 (110), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0637-1.
Oliver, S., Gosden-Kaye, EZ, Winkler, D., & Douglas, JM (2022). The outcomes of individualized housing for people with disability and complex needs: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 44 (7), 1141-1155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1785023.
Polzler, T. (2021). Basic needs in normative contexts. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 16 (5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12732.
Rault, J.-L., Hintze, S., Camerlink, I., & Yee, JR (2020). Positive Welfare and the Like: Distinct Views and a Proposed Framework. Front Vet Sci., Vol. 7 (370), DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00370.
Roosma, F., Gelissen, J., & van Oorschot, W. (2013). The Multidimensionality of Welfare State Attitudes: A European Cross-National Study. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 113 , 235-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0099-4.
Rourke, SB, Bekele, T., Tucker, R., Greene, S., Sobota, M., Koornstra, J., et al. (2012). Housing Characteristics and their Influence on Health-Related Quality of Life in Persons Living with HIV in Ontario, Canada: Results from the Positive Spaces, Healthy Places Study. AIDS Behav, Vol. 16 (8), 2361-2373. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-012-0284-0.
Satterthwaite, D. (2020). Editorial: Getting housing back onto the development agenda: the many roles of housing and the many services it should provide its inhabitants . Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 32 (1), 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820905212.
Steiner, A., McMillan, C., & O'Connor, CH (2022). Investigating the contribution of community empowerment policies to successful co-production- evidence from Scotland. Public Management Review, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2033053.
van der Deijl, W. (2018). Can welfare be measured with a preference-satisfaction index? Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 25 (2), 126-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2017.1413586.
Ward, ML, Franz, J., & Adkins, BA (2014). Livable Housing Design: The Voluntary Provision of Inclusive Housing in Australia. Journal of Social Inclusion, Vol. 5 (1), 43-60. DOI: 10.36251/josi.68.
Ward, P. (2019). Self‐Help Housing. DOI: 10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0281.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6697
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 18 timesPDF - 8 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.