_.gif)
_.gif)
Kintsugi Philosophy for Auditors
Abstract
This study explores the understanding of audit accounting by looking at the audit process through the art of Kintsugi. This research is empirical research using the interpretivism paradigm and collecting data using the interview method on several auditors and clients who are friends of the researcher and performing document analysis. Negotiation has several key behaviours, including communication, data, and service. The interests of auditors and clients are a part that is united by communication, data, and service. Negotiations between auditors and clients create the impression that gold flows through every existing crack. While auditing brings convenience, it never reaches perfection. The audit process can be seen as a kintsugi process which ultimately produces something more valuable through a purification process. This research complements the understanding of previous research. Namely, the performance of auditors can purify financial statements and even broader organizational settings.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ashari, A. (2019). Makna kintsugi, seni membetulkan tembikar yang pecah dengan emas. Retrieved from https://bobo.grid.id/read/081877733/makna-kintsugi-seni-membetulkan-tembikar-yang-pecah-dengan-emas?page=all
Carnazzi, Stefano (2016). Kintsugi: the art of precious scars. Retrieved from https://www.lifegaelefte.com/kintsugi
Christensen, T., Rose, AM, Rose, JM, Sanderson, K.-A. and Thibodeau, J. (2018). “Effects of data visualization on auditors' and jurors' judgments”, Working Paper.
Davison, J. (2015). Visualising Accounting: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 121-165.
Efferin, S., & Hutomo, CC (2021). Spirituality, happiness and auditors' commitment: an interbeing perspective. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(4), 701–730. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2020-4385
Eleftheria, S. (2021). Kintsugi, seni menikmati kerusakan dari perspektif keindahan. Retrieved from https://www.kompasiana.com/shyants81310/613c577831a2876a885f4122/kintsugi-seni-menikmati-kerusakan-dari-prespektif-keindahan?page=all#section1
Gendron, Y. (2002). “On the role of the organization in auditor’s client-acceptance decisions”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 659-684.
Hanifah, S. (2020). Belajar dari filosofi kintsugi: tetap percaya diri dan say no to insecure. Retrieved from https://gensindo.sindonews.com/read/11499/700/belajar-dari-filosofi-kintsugi-tetap-percaya-diri-dan-say-no-to-insecure-1588147456
Hartanto, D. (2020). Sociology Review of Social Phenomenon, Social Rules and Social Technology. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3, (2): 1175-1184.
Hazgui, M. and Gendron, Y. (2015). “Blurred roles and elusive boundaries: on contemporary forms of oversight surrounding professional work”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 28 No. 8, pp. 1234-1262.
Justesen, L., & Skærbæk, P. (2005). Performance auditing and the production of discomfort. In S. Jönsson & J. Mouritsen (Eds.), Accounting in Scandinavia – The northern lights (pp. 321–343). Copenhagen: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
Marlizar, et.al. (2021). Effect of Service Quality and Use of E-Service Technology on Customer Loyalty: A Case Study of Maxim in Aceh. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 4, (4): 8002-8016.
McGuigan, N., & Ghio, A. (2019). Art, accounting and technology: unravelling the paradoxical “in-between.” Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(5), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2019-0474
Morgan, G. (1988). “Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practice”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 477-485.
Neuman, WL (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. In P. Education (Ed.), Teaching Sociology (Seventh Ed, Vol. 30, Issue 3). Allyn & Bacon. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
Pentland, B. (1993). Getting Comfortable with the Numbers: Auditing and the micro-production of macro order, Accounting, Organizations and Society pp. 605-620.
Pramusinto, N.D., Daerobi, A., and Hartanto, D. (2020). Labor Absorption of the Manufacturing Industry Sector in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (1): 549-561.
Power, M. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2–3), 289–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00004-6
Power, M. (2000). The Audit Society - Second Thoughts. International Journal of Auditing, 4(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00306
Power, MK (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-2
Richman-Abdou, K. (2022). Kintsugi: The centuries-old art of repairing broken pottery with gold. Retrieved from https://mymodernmet.com/kintsugi-kintsukuroi/
Sangster, A. (2015). “The genesis of double entry bookkeeping”. The Accounting Review, Vol. 91 No. 1, pp. 299-315
Santini, C. (2019). Kintsugi: Finding strength in imperfection. Kansas: Andrews McMeel Publishing.
Simanungkalit, Denny C. (2018). Filosofi dan nilai nilai estetika Jepang pada kintsugi. Thesis. Fakultas Sastra, Jurusan Jepang, Universitas Darma Persada, Jakarta.
Skærbæk, P. (2009). Public sector auditor identities in making efficiency auditable: The National Audit Office of Denmark as independent auditor and modernizer. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.001
Suddaby, R., Gendron, Y. and Lam, H. (2009). “The organizational context of professionalism in accounting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34 Nos 3/4, pp. 409-427.
Van Gunsterten, HR (1976). The Quest for Control: a Critique of the Rational-central-rule Approach in Public Affairs (Chichester: John Wiley).
Whittington, O. Ray & Kurt Pany. (2019). Principles of auditing & other assurance services. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Wolnizer, PW (1987). Auditing as Independent Authentication (Sydney: Sydney University Press).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6771
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 35 timesPDF - 13 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.