_.gif)
_.gif)
Criticism of Pure Legal Theory Thought Critical Legal Studies (Critical Legal Studies) and its Relevance to the Indonesian Legal System
Abstract
The pure theory of law (pure legal theory), which desires that the law must be free from non-legal elements such as politics, economics, society and others is an essential part of pure legal theory. Legal positivism is known for the importance of the separation between law and morals. In addition, even for positivists, cruel legal norms can be accepted as law on the condition that the formal criteria regarding the law are met. The view of pure legal theory, which assumes that law must be separated from other fields of science, has been criticized by Critical Law Studies (CLS), which assumes that law is always intervened by interests outside the law so that law is never neutral and objective. This means that law cannot be separated from politics because the law is not formed in a value-free vacuum. The thought of Critic Law Studies (CLS) lies in the fact that law is politics (law is politics). Hence, Critic Law Studies (CLS) rejects and attacks the beliefs of positivists in legal science. Critic Law Studies (CLS) criticizes the applicable law for being politically biased and never neutral.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad Gunaxvan, Ed. (2006). Menggagas Hukum Progresif Indonesia, dalam tulisan Adji Samekto berjudul: Membangun Kesadaran Baru Melalui Studi Hukum Kritis, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta. hal. 58.
Brunello, AR. (1966). Airlock acy and Absolutism, the International Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, Volume One — 1-793, Editor Frank N. Magill, Consulting Editor: Joseph McKenna College, General Bibliography: the Derek Gold University of Illinois at Chicago, Toppan Company PTE, LTD, Singapore, hal. 88-89.
Budi, F. Hardiman. (1993). Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif Ilmu, masyarakat, Politik & Postmodernisme Menurut Jurgen, Kanisius, Yogyakarta. hal 17.
Budi, F. Hardiman. Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif Ilmu, masyarakat, Politik.
David Bourchier, op.cit. hal.239.
David Bourchier. (1999). Magic Memos, Collusion arts Judges with Attitude, Notes on the Politics of Law in Contemporary Indonesia, p 234., diambil dari Buku Law, Capitalism, and Power in Asia. The Rule of Law and Legal Institutions, cd. Kanishka Jayasuriya, London. Hal. 235.
Erwin, Muhamad. Filsafat Hukum Refleksi Kritis terhadap Hukum dan Hukum Indonesia
Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law, op. cit, hal.320-328.
Hans Kelsen. (1957). what is, Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science, Collected Essays, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angele, hal. 2-29.
Hans Kelsen. (1967). Pure Theory of Law, translation from the second (revised and enlarged) German edition by Max Knight, University of California Press, Berkeley, Long Angeles – London, (first edition published 1934 by Deuticke, Vienna), hal 59- 69.
Hans Kelsen. (2007). Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara. Dasar Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif sebagai Ilmu Hukani Deskriptif -Empirik, terjemahan dari General Theory' of law •, Bee Media Indonesia, Jakarta.hal. 156.
Huijbregts, Theo. Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintas Sejarah, Pustaka Filsafat, Penerbit Kanisius
Ibid., hal. 108 – 192.
Ibid., hal. 18 – 19.
Ibid., hal. 279– 319
Ibid., hal. 279– 319.
Kasim, Kelsen, Hans. (1999). The Pure Theory of Law, translation from the second (revised and enlarged) German edition by Max Knight, University of California Press, Berkeley, Long Angeles-London, 1967 (first edition published 1934 by Deuticke, Vienna); Ideal. Gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis. Jakarta: ELSAM.
Kelsen, Hans. (1945). General Theory of Law and State, 20th Century legal philosophy Series: Vol.1, translated by Anders Wedberg, Russel & Russel, New York.
Kelsen, Hans. (1957). What Is Justice Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science, Collected Essays. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Kelsen, Hans. (2007). Teori Umum Hukum Umum dan Negara. Dasar - Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif -Empirik, terjenialian dari General Theory of law, Bee Simarmata, Rikardo. “Pendidikan Hukum Kritis: Asal-usul, Faham, Prinsip Baru dan Metode Sebuah Penjelasan Awal”. Jentera: Jurnal Hukum, Edisi Khusus, 2003; Media Indonesia, Jakarta.Movement by Roberto Unger, The New York Times, Sunday. November 23, 1986.Postmodernisme Menurut Jurgen, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 1993;
Magdalena, S., Suhatman, R. (2020). The Effect of Government Expenditures, Domestic Invesment, Foreign Invesment to the Economic Growth of Primary Sector in Central Kalimantan. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). Volume 3, No 3, Page: 1692-1703.
Shah, M. M., et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). Volume 3, No 1, Page: 276-286
Soekanto, soerjono. (1985). Teori yang Murni Tentang Hukum, Penerbit Alumni. Bandung.
Tahir, Mansun. (2014). “Studi Hukum Kritis dalam Kajian Hukum Islam”. Jurnal Hukum Islam. Vol. 13 No. 2, December.
Unger, Roberto M. (1975). Knowledge, and Politics, The Free Press, New York.
Unger, Roberto M. (1983). The Critical Legal Studies Movement. First Edition. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
Unger, Roberto M. (1999). Gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis. judul Asli: The Critical Legal Studies Movement. penerjemah: Ifdhal Kasim. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta. ELSAM.
Woodard Calvin. (1986). Tow'arJ a “Su Rei- Literal Stale”, Review of the 6"critical Legal Studies Movc•menl by Roherlo Unge•r, The New York Times, Sunday. November 23. hal.27.
Woodard, Calvin, Toward a” Super Liberal State'', Review of The Critical Legal Studies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6843
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 24 timesPDF - 86 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.