The Effect of Performance Assessment, Leader Positive Feedback, and Job Autonomy on Innovative Behavior
Abstract
Innovative employee behaviour in a company is due to employees who always develop their ideas at work as a positive reflection for other employees to produce good performance so that company goals can be achieved. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of performance appraisal, positive feedback from leaders, and job autonomy on innovative behaviour. This study used Structural Equation Modeling analysis using a sample of 160 employees in the personnel, marketing, finance and accounting divisions at a three-wheel cement distributor. Data were analyzed using Lisrel software. The results showed that innovative behaviour could be influenced by performance appraisals, positive feedback from leaders, and job autonomy. Therefore, this study has several important managerial implications for superiors, whether adequate performance appraisal, positive feedback given by the leader, or given job autonomy will increase the innovative behaviour of employees. It is suggested that organizations need to pay attention to work autonomy which is an essential factor in improving employee appraisal. Researchers can further replicate the model in different contexts to verify its model's applicability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, R. (2010). Performance appraisal politics and employee turnover intention. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 16, 99–109.
Arif, S. (2019). Influence of Leadership, Organizational Culture, Work Motivation, and Job Satisfaction of Performance Principles of Senior High School in Medan City. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 239-254
Battistelli, A., Montani, F., & Odoardi, C. (2013). The impact of feedback from job and task autonomy in the relationship between dispositional resistance to change and innovative work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.616653
Bysted, R., & Hansen, J. R. (2015). Comparing Public and Private Sector Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types, and subsectors. Public Management Review, 17(5), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841977
Canet-Giner, T., Redondo-Cano, A., Saorín-Iborra, C., & Escribá-Carda, N. (2020). Impact of the perception of performance appraisal practices on individual innovative behavior. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 29(29 November 2020), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-01-2019-0018
Cianci, A. M., Schaubroeck, J. M., & McGill, G. A. (2010). Achievement Goals, Feedback, and Task Performance. Human Performance, 23(2), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959281003621687
Deci, E. L. (2005). 10.1002@Job.322.Pdf. 362(January), 331–362.
Dusterhoff, C., Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2014). The Effects of Performance Rating, Leader-Member Exchange, Perceived Utility, and Organizational Justice on Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Applying a Moral Judgment Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1634-1
Etikariena, A. (2020). Peran Gaya Kepemimpinan Pada Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Karyawan Pada Organisasi Berbasis Teknologi Digital. Jurnal Ecopsy, 7(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecopsy.v7i1.8426
Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., Swanson, C., Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (2016). Predicting Marital Happiness and Stability from Newlywed Interactions Published by : National Council on Family Relations Predicting Marital Happiness and Stability from Newlywed Interactions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/job
Hair, J. Dutta, T., & Mandal, M. K. (2018). Neuromarketing in India. Neuromarketing IN INDIA IN INDIA.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1991). Supervisory Feedback: Alternative Types and Their Impact on Salespeople’s Performance and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 190. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172807
Kinyili, J., & Nzioki, S. (2020). http://www.ijssit.com. Internal Journal of Social, V(VIII), 35–41.
Lee, W. R., Choi, S. B., & Kang, S. W. (2021). How leaders’ positive feedback influences employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of voice behavior and job autonomy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041901
Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R., Hart, Z., & Peterson, D. L. (1999). A test of antecedents and outcomes of employee role negotiation ability. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365522
Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The Effect of Training on Work Performance and Career Development: The Role of Motivation as Intervening Variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1940
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.376
Paulo. (2019). No Titיליle. ペインクリニック学会治療指針2, 1–9.
Ranihusna, D., Nugroho, A. S., Ridloah, S., Putri, V. W., & Wulansari, N. A. (2021). A model for enhancing innovative work behavior. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 747(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/747/1/012039
Ratnasari, D., & Wulansari, N. A. (2019). Management Analysis Journal Effect of Leader-Member Exchange on Innovative Work Behaviour throught Work Engagement as a Mediation. Management Analysis Journal, 8(2).
Sari, F. K., & Palupiningdyah, P. (2020). The Effect of Mediation Work Engagement to Procedural Justice and Organizational Learning on the Innovative Behavior. Management Analysis Journal, 9(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v9i2.37011
Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/256789
Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258440
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6893
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 68 timesPDF - 17 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.