The Effect of Governance on Firm Value with Financial Performance as a Mediation Variable in Go Public Companies in Indonesia
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze corporate governance on firm value with financial performance as a mediating variable in manufacturing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with corporate governance indicators consisting of CEO Duality and CEO Tenure. The benefit of this research is that good governance will increase financial performance and firm value. The sample used in this study consisted of the annual financial statements of all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sample of this study was 44 companies selected through purposive sampling method. The company data for this sample selection was taken from financial reports and annual reports from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange, namely idx.co.id and the company's official website. Data processing is done using Eviews. The results of this study can show the effect of CEO Duality and CEO Tenure on firm value and financial performance as mediating variables. The results show that CEO Duality, CEO Tenure has an effect on, financial performance and, CEO Duality, CEO Tenure has an effect on firm value, financial performance is able to mediate, CEO Duality and firm Value and financial performance is not able to mediate CEO Tenure and Firm Value.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abels, PB, & Martelli, JT (2013). CEO Duality: how many hats are too many?. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 13(2), 135-147.
Abdillah, W., and Jogiyanto, HM 2009. Concepts and Applications of PLS for Empirical Research. First Edition, BPFE-Yogyakarta
Baliga, BR, Moyer, RC, & Rao, RS (1996). CEO Duality and firm performance: What's the fuss?. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 41-53.
Blose, LE, & Shieh, JC (1997). Tobin's q‐Ratio and Market Reaction to Capital Investment Announcements. Financial Review, 32(3), 449-476.
Boyd, BK (1995). CEO Duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 301-312.
Brickley, JA, Coles, JL, & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189-220.
Coles, JW, McWilliams,VB, & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of management, 27(1), 23-50.
Combs, JG, Crook, TR, & Shook, CL (2005). The dimensionality of organizational performance and its implications for strategic management research. Research methodology in strategy and management, 2(05), 259-286.
Cronqvist, H., & Nilsson, M. (2003). Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 38(04), 695-719.
Dahya, J., & McConnell, JJ (2005). Outside directors and corporate board decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 37-60.
Daily, CM, Dalton, DR, Ellstrand, AE, & Johnson, JL (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic management journal, 19(3), 269-290. 336 BUSINESS ACCOUNTING REVIEW, Vol. 4, NO. 1, JANUARY 2017 (325-336)
Daily CM, Dalton DR, Canella AA (2003). Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data, Aca. Manage. Rev. 28(3): 371-383.
Dalton, DR, Daily, CM, Johnson, JL, & Ellstrand, AE (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A metaanalysis. Academy of Management journal, 42(6), 674-686.
Dayton, KN (1984), Corporate Governance: The Other Side of the Coins, Harvard Business Review, 62 (1): 34-47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6994
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 31 timesPDF - 13 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.