_.gif)
_.gif)
Implications Of The Inquiry Strategy on Science Process Skills and Students Learning Outcomes in Learning Growth and Development Systems of Plants at SMA and MA Negeri Kembang Tanjong Pidie Regency
Abstract
This study aimed to determined the differences between learning with free inquiry strategies on science process skills and learning outcomes on the materials of growth and development at SMA and MA in Kembang Tanjong, Pidie Regency. Data was collected on 6 October to 10 November 2018. This study use a quantitative descriptive approach with a quasi-experimental research technique. The design in this study is a non-equivalent control group design. The collecting of data divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The number of samples in this study were 50 students for the experimental class and 52 students for the control class. Hypothesis this study testing based on the SPSS program version 23.0 for windows of a significance level of 0.05 obtained results; the value of science process skills students 6,055> 1.98 (thitung> ttabel), the value of student learning outcomes of a significance level of 0.05 obtained sig value is 5.965> 1.98 (thitung> ttabel). Based on two variables measured show that the implementation of the inquiry strategy there are differences between the science process skills and student learning outcomes in the material growth and development in plants at SMA and MA Negeri KembangTanjong, Pidie Regency.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Brickman, P., 2009. Effects Of Inquiry-based learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 3 (2). 1-22
Campbell, N.A., J.B.Reece dan L.G. Mitchell. (2000). Biologi Jilid II. Jakarta. Erlangga.
Carin, A.A. & Sund, R.B. 1975. Teaching Science trough Discovery, 3rd Ed. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Dahar, R.W. 2011. Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Delismar. Ashyar, R,. Hariyadi, B. 2013. Peningkatan Kreativitas dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa melalui Penerapan Model Group Investigation. Jurnal Edu-Sains 1 (2). 25-32
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2003. Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Biologi Sekolah Menengah Atas dan Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Balitbang Depdiknas.
Endah, N. 2015. Pengembangan Modul Ipa Terpadu Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing Dengan Tema Barbeque Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Tawangmangu. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Surakarta: FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Vol 4 No 4.
Gulo, W. 2008. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Grasindo
Hassard. J. 2005. The Art of Teaching Science: Inquiry and Innovation in Middle and High School. Oxford University Press. Oxford New York
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. 2011. Model-Model Pengajaran. Terjemahan Achmad Fawaid dan Ateilla Mirza. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Kim, K. H., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and behavior problems among underachievers. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 185–193.
Langgulung, H. 1991. Beberapa Tinjauan dalam Pendidikan Islam. Kuala Lumpur. Pustaka Antara.
Lefrancois, G. R. 1996. Psychology for Teaching. Belmont. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Mahanal, S. 2009. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Project Based Learning pada Materi Ekosistem terhadap Sikap dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMAN 2 Malang. Jurnal Sains. 1-10.
Mulyasa, E. 2005. Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munandar, U. 1982. Kreativitas dan Keberbakatan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Munandar, U. 1999. Mengembangkan Bakat dan Kreativitas Anak Sekolah. Petunjuk bagi Para Guru dan Orang Tua. Jakarta: Gramedia Widyasara Indonesia
Munandar, U. 2009. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nur, M. & Wikandari, P. R. 2000. Pengajaran Berpusat Kepada Peserta didik Dan Pendekatan Konstruktivis Dalam Pengajaran. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya University Press.
Retno, P. 2010, Pengaruh Model Pembelajara Inkuiri Terbimbing (Guide Inquiry) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Kemampuan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi (High Order Thinking Skill) Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Malang Pada Pokok Bahasan Hidrokarbon. Skrips. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rustaman, N. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: UM Press
Sandra, E., Cain & Jack, M. E. 1990. Sciencing: An Involvement Approach to Elementary Science Methods. Third Edition. Toronto: Merill Publishing Company.
Sanjaya, W. 2005. Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Semiawan, C. 1992. Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses: Bagaimana Mengaktifkan Siswa dalam Belajar. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Semiawan, C.. 2002. Dimensi Kreatif Dalam Filsafat Ilmu. Bandung. Remaja Rosada Karya.
Soeparwoto. 2004. Evaluasi Layanan Bimbingan Konseling. Semarang. Unnes.
Sudjana, N. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarya.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung. Alfabeta
Suryabrata, B. 1991. Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Tajalli, F, B,. Zandi, Z. 2010. Creativity comparison between students who studied life skills courses and those who didn't. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 5 (2010) 1390–1395
Torrance, E. P. 1974. Future Careers for Creativity Student. Gilfred Child: Quarterly.
Trianto. 2010. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana.
Widyaningsih, S, Y,. Haryono. Saputro, S,. 2012. Model MFI dan POGIL ditinjau dari Aktivitas belajar dan Kreativitas Siswa terhadap hasil Belajar. Jurnal Inkuiri 1 (3) 266-275.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i1.722
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 143 timesPDF - 218 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.