The Crime of Prostitution in View of the KUHP and Law No. 19 Year 2016

Ariman Sitompul

Abstract


Sex work through social media has now become a criminal problem that is often encountered through social media, Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook, and other applications such as micat and tantan. This happens with the increase in a person's lifestyle or economic problems. Proof of criminal law in cyber crimes in the form of commercial sex workers through social media is the focus of this research. The type of legal research carried out is normative juridical, so the approach used is the Statute approach and the conceptual approach. Evidence of cyber prostitution is the same as Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely regarding evidence in the form of witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions. However, in the ITE Law, cases that become evidence can be said to be digital evidence because they are in the form of electronic information and/or electronic documents in accordance with the criteria in Article 1 number 1 and number 4 of Law Number 19 of 2016 so that this digital evidence can clarify facts that have occurred supported by other evidence.


Keywords


crime; prostitution; evidence

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Karim Nasution,(1980), Masalah Surat Tuduhan dalam Proses Pidana, Percetakan Negara R.I, Jakarta.

Abdul Hakim G. Nusantara,(1986), Kuhap dan Peraturan-peraturan Pelaksanaan, Djambatan, Jakarta.

Bakhri,Syaiful, (2009), Hukum Pembuktian dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana, Jakarta, P3IH dan Total Media.

Bambang Purnomo, (2004), Pokok-Pokok Tata Cara Peradilan Indonesia, Liberti, Jogjakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief, (2007),Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Edmon Makarim,(2004), Kompilasi Hukum Telematika, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo.

Harahap, M. Yahya, (2012), Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.

--------------------------.(2012), Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.

Hiariej, Edd.O, (2012), Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta, Erlangga.

M. Yahya Harahap,(1985), Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, PT sarana bakti Semesta, Jakarta.

Peraturan Perundang-undang

Subekti,R, (2010), Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramita.

Undang- undang R.I. Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

Undang- undang R.I. Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. KUHP.

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang R.I Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i4.7266

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 40 times
PDF - 14 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.