Improving Students’ Listening Comprehension through New Vocabulary Learning

Christian Neni Purba

Abstract


This research is about the improving student’s comprehension in listening through introducing the new vocabulary. The background of research was based on phenomenon that students had  in the classroom at FKIP UHN. They had problems  in listening one of the them was lack of vocabulary. This research focused on the way to improve the students’ comprehension in listening.This research applies classroom action research, aimed to describe the improvement process of teaching learning listening. t used intimate language style. The result of this study found  that in the pre cycle the students’ average score is 57. 82%. In the first cycle the students’ average score is 68.38. In the second cycle the students’ average score is 72.  The average of students score was  always increasing. It means that improvement of students listening comprehension increase each cyles by learning new vocabulary.


Keywords


Listening comprehension; improving; vocabulary

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bell, J.( 2005). Doing Your Research Project 4th edition.New York: Open University Press.

Boulos, M.N.K., Maramba, I. & Wheeler, S. (2006). A new Generation of Web

Brown, H.D. (2000).Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco: San Francisco University.

________. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. San Francisco: San Francisco University.

________. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (Third edition). San Francisco: San FranciscoUniversity.

Burns, A.(1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers.United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

________. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Roudledge Taylor and FrancisGroup.

Dunn, L. (2002). Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series: Theories of Learning.Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development OCSLD.June 27, p. 99/ col. 2.

Feez, S., & Joyce, H. (1998).Text-Based Syllabus Design.Sydney: ResearchMacquiarie University.

Grasha, A.F. (2002).Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Style. San Bernadino:Alliance Publisher.

Helgesen, M. (2003). Listening in Practical Language Teaching.Edited by David Nunan.New York: McGraw-Hill.

Maria, A.S. (1998). Modules for the Professional Preparation of Teaching Assistants in Foreign Languages.Washington, DC: Center for AppliedLinguistics.

Stevens,V, &Dieu, B. (2007). Pedagogical affordances of syndication, aggregation, and mash-up of content published on the Web. TESL-EJ,11(1).(http://tesl-ej.org/ej41/int.html)

Syakur, A. (2020). Needs Analysis English For Specific Purposes (ESP) For Vocational Pharmacy Students, Budapest International Research in Linguistics and Education Sciences (BirLE). P. 724-73.

Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second Language Listening: Ability or Language

Proficiency?The Modern Language Journal 90, 6-18




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.971

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 110 times
PDF - 432 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.