Judge's Role in Court to Eradicate Corruption According to Law Number 20 in 2001 (Study of Decision 16/PID.SUS.K/2011/PN.MDN)

Rizkan Zulyadi

Abstract


The main issues in this paper are as follows judge's role in court to eradicate corruption according to law number 20 in 2001 (Study of Decision 16/PID.SUS.K/2011/PN.MDN). This type of research is normative or normative juridical or library legal research which can be interpreted as legal research by examining library materials and secondary materials.The nature of this study is descriptive analytical.This research will be carried out by the researcher is Medan Disrict Court, having his address at Court Road No. 8 Medan Medan City, North Sumatera Province This research will be carried out by researchers starting in December 2018 until completion Data collection techniques are used in writing this essay are through library research techniques and also through the help of electronic media, namely the internet, and the method of data analysis conducted by the author is to use a normative legal approach that examines secondary data. The result shows that the role of the judge in an effort to eradicate corruption cases in the Medan District Court contained in the Decision Study 16/PID.SUS.K/2011/PN.MDN, namely to prosecute the process of corruption cases and impose corruption penalties with imprisonment during 2 (two) years 6 (six) months and a fine of Rp. 50,000,000 (fifty million rupiahs), provided that the fine is not paid, it must be replaced with imprisonment for 2 (two) months.


Keywords


judge's role; crime; corruption; Law Number 20 Year 2001

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alatas, Syed Hussein. Sosiologi Korupsi: Sebuah Penjelajahan Dengan Data Kontemporer, LP3ES, Jakarta, 2015.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta, 2016.

Barda Nawawi, Arief. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Penerbit PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2015.

Friedrich, Carl J. Constitutional Government and Democracy Theory and Practise in Europe and America, Blaidell Publishing Company, Weldha, 2014.

Hamid, Praktek Peradilan Perkara Pidana, CV. Al-Ikhsan, Surabaya, 2015.

Hehamahua, Abdullah. Membangun Gerakan Antikorupsi Dalam Perspektif Pengadilan, LP3 UMY, Yogyakarta, 2014.

Julian, D.M Lew. Applicate Law in International Commercial Arbitration, Netherlands Sijthoff an Norhoff, 2014.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Teori, Praktik, Tehnik Penyusunan dan Permasalahannya. Citra Adtya Bakti, Bandung 2016.

Oomar Sono, Adji. Hukum-hakim Pidana, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta, 2016.

Pompe, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Bintang Indonesia, Bandung, 2015.

Prakoso Djoko, Alat Bukti dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Di Dalam Proses Pidana, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2016.

Santoso, Topo. Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Urgensi Pembenahan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana

Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 2016.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.972

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 99 times
PDF - 138 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.