Analysis of Community Institution Empowerment as a Village Government Partner in the Participative Development Process

Nina Angelia, Beby Masitho Batubara, Rizkan Zulyadi, Taufik Wal Hidayat, Riri Rezeki Hariani

Abstract


This research focuses on analyzing the empowerment of social institutions as village government partners in the participatory development process. The location is in Percut Village, Percutseituan District, Deliserdang Regency. The background that is used as a reference for this research begins with the understanding that the urgency of villages in development in Indonesia is so urgent. The village is given authoritative to grow and develop in line with the development of its own community. Furthermore, the village holds millions of pieces of knowledge of the virtues of life and harmony of local wisdom that should be maintained, can be recognized from the mantra of three orders, namely; ordinances, manners, and manners (Zamroni, 2017). This kind of thinking construction is important to restate in order to examine the current relationship between the village government and the community (social institutions). Social institutions as partners of the Village Government have a very strategic role; start to formulate participatory development plans, implement, control, utilize, maintain and develop participatory development, mobilize and develop participation, mutual cooperation and community self-help, and foster dynamic development of the community in the context of community empowerment. Seeing the huge role that village community institutions have, it is important and interesting that this research is carried out to see the existence of community institutions as village government partners in the participatory development process. With this research, it will provide reference data for stakeholders related to community institution empowerment. In addition, it is an academic study in public policy and provides input to the village government regarding the reference to the model of community institution empowerment as a partner of the village government in order to work together to manage development in a participatory village. As for answering the problem of this study using qualitative methods and types of research with a descriptive approach. The targeted research output is a journal article and as a follow up will create a model in the institutionalization of village community organizations.


Keywords


social institutions; village government; participatory development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adisasmita R. (2013). Teori-teori Pembangunan Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Ardi Novra. (2013). PNPM-MP dalam Perpektif Akademisi. Materi Semiloka DPRD Kab. Batanghari.

Anthony Giddens. (1984). The constitution of Society: The Outline of The Theory of Structuration (pdf). University of California Press

Conyers, Diana. (1991). Perencanaan Sosial di Dunia Ketiga. Yogyakarta: UGM Press

Ismail. (2019). Social Changes in the Post-Tsunami Banda Aceh City. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 45-50.

Krisnawati, Cici jurnal JOM FISIP Vol. 4 No. 1 – Februari 2017

Lembaran Negara: Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 5 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pedoman Penataan Lembaga Kemasyarakatan.

Maleong, Lexi. (2000). Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung :PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mardikanto, Totok dan Soebiato, Poerwoko. (2012). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Perpektif Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta

Norman K Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. (2009). Hanbook Of Qualitative Research (terj). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Salim, Emil. (1986). Pembangunan Berwawasan Lingkungan. Jakarta: LP3ES

Schumacher. (1979). Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Desa. Malang : Setara Press.

Sevilla, G.Convelo. (1993). Pengantar Metodelogi Penelitian. Jakarta : UII Press

Soedarmayanti. (2007). Good Goverment. CV. Bandung : Mandar Maju.

Soerjono, Soekanto. (2009). Sosiologi suatu pengantar, edisi baru. Raja wali Pers Jakarta

_______________.(2000). Sosiologi suatu pengantar. Raja wali Pers, Jakarta

Subroto, Agus. (2009). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa (Studi kasus pengelolaan alokasi dana desa di Desa-desa dalam wilayah Kecamatan Tlogomulyo Kabupaten Temanggung tahun 2008. Dipublikasikan. Tesis. Program Studi Magister Sains Akuntansi. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Sugiono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sulistiyani. 2004. Manajemen dan Pemerintah. BPFE, Yogyakarta

Sumpeno. (2011). Perencanaan Desa Terpadu. Read, Banda Aceh.

Suwandi, Dewi Rostyaningsih.( 2012) Perencanaan Pembangunan Partisipatif Di Desa Surakarta Kecamatan Suranenggala Kabupaten Cirebon. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review. JPPMR. Vol 1 nomor 2 (ejournal.undip.ac.id)

Veithzal, Rivai. (2006). Administrasi Pemerintah dalam Pemerintahan. Jakarta : Pt Rineka.

Widjaja, HAW. (2013). Otonomi Desa merupakan otonomi yang asli, bulat dan utuh. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta

___________.(2002). Pemerintah desa dan Administrasi Desa menurut Undang-undang No 5 Tahun (1979). PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Widjaja. (2003). Otonomi Desa Merupakan Otonomi Yang Asli, Bulat dan Utuh. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Zamroni, Sunaji. (2017). Potret Politik & Ekonomi Lokal di Indonesia, Dinamika Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, (2014) .“Buku I Rancangan Awal RPJMN 2015-2019, Jakarta




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.991

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 306 times
PDF - 169 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.