The Effect of STAD Cooperative Learning Model and Critical Thinking Ability on Learning Outcomes PPKn Grade V Students of SD Negeri 060934 Medan Johor

Romaida Karo Karo, Reh Bungana Br Perangin-Angin, Abdul Murad

Abstract


This study aims to determine the differences in student learning outcomes taught by the cooperative learning model type STAD and conventional teaching, to find out the differences in the learning outcomes of PPKn students who have higher critical thinking skills compared to students who have low critical thinking skills, and to find out whether there is an interaction between the STAD type cooperative learning model with critical thinking skills on the learning outcomes of PPKn grade V students of SD Negeri 060934 Medan Johor. This research was conducted at SD Negeri 060934 Medan Johor. The research sample was determined by cluster random sampling, one class as an experimental class was taught with a STAD type cooperative learning model and one control class was taught conventionally. The sample to be studied amounted to 52 students consisting of 25 experimental class students and 27 control class students. Critical thinking ability tests are conducted to classify students who have high critical thinking skills and low critical thinking skills. Data were analyzed using two-way ANAVA using statistical tests with factorial design of 2x2 ANAVA with a significance level of > 0.05. Previously performed the normality test and homogeneity test analysis. The results showed that the learning outcomes taught using the STAD type cooperative learning model are better than conventional learning models in improving PKn learning outcomes of students as well as students who have high critical thinking skills who obtain better learning outcomes than students who have low critical thinking skills.


Keywords


STAD cooperative learning model type; critical thinking; learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, Donald, Jacobs, L. C. and Razavieh, Asghar. (2011). Pengantar Penelitian dalamPendidikan, Terjemahan Arief Furchan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.ctober 20

Dwiyogo. (2018).Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Fisher, Alec. (2009). Berpikir Kritis Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Fuad, N, M, et al. 2017. Improving Junior High Schools’ Critical Thinking Skills Basedon Test Three Different Models of Learning. International Journal of Instruction. Vol. 10, No. 1.

Hamruni. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.

Jhonson, Elaine B. (2012). CTL: Contextual Teaching & Learning Menjdikan Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermutu. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama.

Mukmin, B. A., et al. (2019). Citizenship Politics (Reviewing the Meaning of Democracy in Majanggut I Village, Royal District Pakpak Barat Regency). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 354-362.

Nasution, S. (2010). Kurikulum dan Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Panggabean, R.H.,et al. (2019). Student Learning Result of Citizenship Education in Internet Learning Media with High Interpersonal Communication in High School Al-Azhar Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 491-498.

Rangkuti, A. N. and Hasibuan, W. S. (2019). Learning of Spatial Operations in 1st Grade of Junior High School (MTs.S NU Paringgonan) Ulu Barumun Sub-district Padang Lawas Regency. Budapest International Research in Linguistics and Education Sciences (BirLE) Journal. 2(1): 181-193.

Rusman. (2016). Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme

Guru Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Rusman. (2018). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sani, R. A. (2018). Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). Jakarta: Tira Smart.

Sanjaya, W. (2011). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Setiawan, D, dan Setiawan, F. (2014). Pendidikan Karakter dalam Perspektif Kewarganegaraan. Medan. LARISPA.

Shoimin, A. (2018). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013.

Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZ MEDIA.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar & Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta.

Slavin, R. E. (2016). Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Sudana, P. A., dan Wesnawa, G.A. (2017). Penerapan Model PembelajaranKooperatifTipe STAD untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar. Vol.1 No.1.

Surip, M. (2017).Berpikir Kritis Analisis Kajian Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Halaman Moeka.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.959

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.959.g1292

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 203 times
PDF - 223 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License