The Effect of Blended Learning Strategy and Creative Thinking of Students on the Results of Learning Information and Communication Technology by Controlling Prior Knowledge

Resien Resien, Harun Sitompul, Julaga Situmorang

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in learning outcomes of ICT subjects between groups of students who are taught with blended learning strategies and expository who have the ability to think creatively after being controlled by initial knowledge. This research method uses quasi experiment with 2x2 factorial design. Data analysis techniques used two-way ANCOVA at a significant level  = 0.05. The results showed that (1) ICT learning outcomes between groups of students taught with blended learning strategies were higher than those of students who were taught with expository learning strategies after controlling for initial knowledge; (2) there is an interaction effect between learning strategies and the ability to think creatively on ICT learning outcomes after controlling initial knowledge; (3) for students who have high creative thinking skills, ICT learning outcomes among groups of students taught with blended learning strategies are higher than those of students who are taught with expository learning strategies after controlling initial knowledge; (4) for groups of students who have low creative thinking ability, ICT learning outcomes among groups of students who are taught expository learning strategies are higher than groups of students who are taught with blended learning learning strategies after controlling for initial knowledge. Based on the results of this study, to improve the learning outcomes of Information and Communication Technology students are done by implementing BL learning strategies with regard to student characteristics.


Keywords


learning strategies; blended learning; creative thinking; expository; initial knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar, N., Muhammad, Aness, Muhammad, Khizar, et.al. (2012). Relationship of Creative Thinking with the Academic Achievements of Secondary SchoolStudents. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education. 1(3). Hlm. 44-47

Ai, X. (1999). Creativity and Academic Achievement: An Investigation of Gender Differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), Hlm.329-337.

Asian Journal of Psychology and Education, 6. Hlm.1-4.

Azhar, Arsyad. (2002). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.

Bersin, Josh. (2004). The Blended Learning Book : Best Practice, Proven Methologies, and

Lessons Learned. United State of America : Pfeifer. Hlm.xv, 56.

Asha, C. B. (1980). Creativity and academic achievement among secondary school children.

Bonk, Curtis, J & Graham, R., Charles. 2006. The Handbook of Blended Learning : Global

Perspective, Local Designs. San Fransisco : Pfeiffer. Hlm. 4-5.

Bostrom, Lena, & Lassen, M., Liv. (2006). Unraveling Learning, Learning Styles, Learning

Strategies and Metacognition. Creative Problem Solving Ability”. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, Vol. 7(3)

Christensen, Clayton, M., Horn, Michael, B., & Staaker, Heater. (2013). Is K-12 Blended

Learning Disruptive? An Introduction to the Theory of Hybrids. Clayton Christensen

Institute for Disruptive Innovation. Hlm.9.

De Bono, E. (2007). Revolusi Berpikir. Bandung:Kaifa. Ismienar, S., Andrianti, H., & A., S. V. 2009. Thinking. Malang.

Dick, Walter; Carey, Lou; dan Carey, James O. (2009). The Systematic Design of Instructiona. New Jersey : Pearson Education, Inc. Hlm. 7, 70, 93

Dwiyogo, D., Wasis. (2018). Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning. Depok : PT.

RajaGrafindo Persada. Hlm.133,135.

Ervync, G. (1991). “Mathematical Creativity”. Dalam Tall, D. Advanced Mathematical Learning. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher

Garisson, Randy, D and Vaughan, Norman, D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education. United States of America : John Wiley & Sons, Icn.

Getzels, J. W. and Jackson P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted

students. New York: Wiley.

Haylock, D. (1997). “Recognising mathematical creativity in school children”. Zentralblatt fuer Didaktikder Mathematik, Vol. 29(3)

Kristiana, Melia. (2016). Pengaruh Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dan Positif Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. JKPM, Vol.02, No.01, 01 Des 2016. Hlm. 57–68.

Lee, K. S., Hwang, D. J. Seo, J. J. (2003). “A Development of the Test for Mathematical

Mahmudi, A. (2010). “Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis”. Makalah. Konferensi Nasional Matematika XV UNIMA 30 Juni – 3 Juli 2010.

Mann, E. (2005). “Mathematical Creativity and School Mathematics: Indicators of Mathematical Creativity in Middle School Students”. Disertasi. University of Connecticut.

Marsh, Debra. (2012). Blended Learning : Creating Learning Opportunites for Languages Learners. The United States of America : Cambridge University Press, hlm. 4 Learning and Teaching Unit 2013, Fundamentals of Blended Learning. Australia : University of Western Sydney, 2013. Hlm. 5.

Muawanah, S. (2017). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Pengetahuan Awal TerhadapHasil

Belajar Teknik Listrik Dasar Otomotif Siswa SMKN 1 Kota Bekasi. Jurnal Teknologi

Pendidikan. Vol. 19, No. 2, Agustus 2017.

Nurfauzia, Kaharuddin dan Khaeruddin. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Penemuan

Dan Pengetahuan Awal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas XI MIA SMAN 16 Makassar. Tesis. Makasar : Universitas Negeri Makasar.

Prawiradilaga, Dewi Salma. (2007). Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana, hlm.24.

Santrock, John W. 2008. Psikologi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua, terjemahan Tri Wibowo B.S.. Jakarta : Kencana Perdana Media Group. Hlm. 357 & 638.

Precel, Karen, Alkahalai, Yoram & Alberton, Yael. (2009). Pedagogical and Design Aspects of a Blended Learning Course. International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning. Volumne 10, Number 2. ISSN: 1492-3831.

Purwaningsih, Helen. (2014). Pengaruh Blended Learning dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil

Belajar IPA. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan. 16(2). Hlm.100.

Reigeluth, C. M., & Joseph, R. (2002). Beyond Technology Integration : The Case for Technology Transformation. Educational Technology, 42(4). Hlm.9-14 West,R.E., & Graham, C. R. (2005). Five Powerful Ways Technology Can Enhance Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Educational Technology, 45(3). Hlm.20-27.

Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and Themes: Research, Development and Practice.

Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Sandi, Gede. (2012). Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar KimiaDitinjau Dari

Kemandirian Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, Jilid 45, Nomor 3, Oktober 2012.

Shand, Kristen & Farrelly, Glassett, Susan. (2017). Using Blended Teaching to Teach Blended Learning : Lessons Learned from Pre-Service Teachers in a Instructional Methods Course. Journal of Online Learning Research. 3(1). Hlm.9.

Shi, Changju. (2011). Study of the Relationship Between Cognitive Styles and Learning

Strategies. Higher Education Studies. 1(1). Hlm.20-26.

Silver, E. A. (1997). “Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing”. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, Vol.29(3).

Sorden, Stephen, D. (2011). Relationships Among Collaborative Learning, Social Presence and Student Satisfaction In a Blended Learning Environment. Northern Arizona University. Disertation. Hlm.16,17.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2004). “Identifying Creative Thinking Process of Students Through Mathematics Problem Posing”. Makalah. International Conference on Statistics and Mathematics and Its Application in the Development of Science and Technology, Universitas Islam Bandung, 4-6 Oktober 2004.

Sitorus, H. (2019). The Effect of Learning Strategy and Thinking Ability on The Students’ Learning Outcomes in Economics Subject of XI Social Students in Senior High School State 1 in Pematang Siantar. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal. p. 451-460.

Suparno, Paul. (1997). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta : Erlangga. Hlm.53-54. Seels, Barbara; dan Glasgow, Zita. 1998. Making Instructional Design Decision 2nd Edition. New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc. Hlm.275

Tilaar, H.A.R., Paat, Jimmy, Ph., & Paat, Lody. (2011). Pedagogik Kritis. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta. Hlm.13.

Torrance, E. P. (1959). Explorations in Creative Thinking in the Early School Year: VI.

Highly Intelligent and Highly Creative Children in a Laboratory School. Minneapolis: Bur. Edu. Res. University of Minnesota.

Uno, B., Hamzah, Umar K; dan Panjaitan, Masri, K. (2014). Variabel Penelitian Dalam

Pendidikan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : PT. Ina Publikatama. Hlm. 113-115.

Wahyuni, Arie dan Kurniawan, Prihadi. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Matematika Vol. 17, No. 2




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.997

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 60 times
PDF - 25 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.