Settlement of Waqf Disputes by Deliberation to Reach Consensus
Abstract
Waqf functions to realize the potential and economic benefits of waqf property for the benefit of worship and to promote public welfare. The use of the waqf property needs to be developed in accordance with sharia principles, but in fact, there are still problems that the waqf property is not in accordance with its function. Waqf assets are requested or taken back by the wakif or wakif heirs, or vice versa, the waqf assets are controlled from generation to generation by nazhir whose use deviates from the waqf contract, is not responsible for his obligations to maintain the waqf property, neglect or transfer it. To third parties in an unlawful manner. This study will explore and examine the process of resolving disputes over waqf property. Is the settlement process by deliberation better than proceeding through the courts? Because the issue of waqf has been regulated in Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf. The law regulates how to waqf property, develop waqf assets and how to resolve waqf disputes through deliberation to reach consensus. It is better if the dispute over waqf property is first resolved by deliberation to reach consensus. The legal basis for deliberative settlement is regulated in Article 62 of Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf, but the detailed process is not regulated so that it is almost equated with the mediation process so that the disputing parties prefer to go through the courts, even though the deliberative settlement process is very good.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Manan. (2012). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dalam Perspektif Kewenangan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana.
Adi Nur Rohman and Sugeng. Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf Di Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan.
Ahmad Rofiq, Ro’fah Setyowati, Dewi Hendrawati. (2019). “Implementasi uu wakaf dalam penyelesaian sengketa wakaf di wilayah pesisir jawa tengah”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jilid 48 No.4, Oktober 2019.
Anshoruddin. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perwakafan Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Nasional. Kanwil Kemenag Kalbar: Sosialisasi Tentang Wakaf, Selasa 27 September.
Ariesthina Laelah. (2020). “Pencegahan sengketa wakaf melalui profesionalitas nazhir perwakafan”, Al-Tafaqquh: Journal of Islamic Law, Volume 1 Nomor 2 Juli 2020.
Zamakhsyari Baharuddin dan Rifqi Qowiyul Iman. (2018). “Nazir Wakaf Profesional, Standarisasi dan Problematikanya”, Volume 3, Nomor 2, Desember 2018.
Badan wakaf Indonesia, Pengertian wakaf, https://www.bwi.go.id/pengertian-wakaf, tanggal (diakses 18 Februari, pukul 13.35 WIB).
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1989). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Junaidi Abdullah dan Nur Qodin. (2014). “Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf Dalam Hukum Positif’’ ZISWAF, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Kamal, M et al. (2019). Method of Instinbāth Law of Money Waqf Abu Hanifah Immediate Perspective. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 304-313
Moh. Mahrus. (2016). “Alternatif Sengketa Wakaf”, artikel dalam Jurnal Al-Awqaf, Vol. 9, Nomor 2.
M. Quraisi Shihab. (1996). Wawasan Al-Qur’an. Bandung: Mizan
M. Yahya Harahap. (1990). Kedudukan, Kewenangan dan Acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta, PT. Sarana Bakti Semesta.
Qurratul Aini Wara Hastuti. (2014).“Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama Kudus Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf”, artikel dalam Jurnal Ziswaf, vol. 1, No. 1.
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/40494/6/BAB%20I.pdf
https://bwisumut.or.id/2019/12/06/nazhir-wakaf-harus-amanah-dan-profesional/
https://bwisumut.or.id/2019/09/17/permasalahan-wakaf-di-jl-merdeka-d-h-gg-minang-pulo-brayan/
http://sipp.pn-medankota.go.id/list_perkara/search
http://www.sipp.pa-medan.go.id/list_perkara/search
https://blog.bplawyers.co.id/mengenal-lebih-jauh-tentang-arbitrase-syariah/
https://www.ilmusaudara.com/2016/03/pengertian-dan-prinsip-serta-ciri.html
https://www.sugiyatno.com/2020/08/alternatif-penyelesaian-sengketa.html
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2743
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 58 timesPDF - 53 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.