Overlap in the Disqualification Rules for Regional Head Election Winners
Abstract
Regulations regarding the settlement of disputes in regional head elections are divided based on the types and qualifications of administrative violations, criminal administrative violations, electoral administrative disputes, criminal violations, outcome disputes, and ethical violations. The division of the qualifications of these problems has led to a settlement process that is not in harmony with each other. It even causes an overlapping process between one violation and another, between one judicial institution and another judicial institution, as in the case of the settlement of the cancellation of the winner of the regional head election in Bandar Lampung in 2020. This study investigates the issue of the rules for the cancellation of the candidate pair winning the regional head election. This study is normative juridical research. Furthermore, the research approach used is concept, legislation, and case approaches. The results of this study indicate that, based on the ius contituentum, the cancellation of the winner of the regional head election can be pursued through legal remedies for Criminal Administration Violations (Article 135A) which are tried by the Election Supervisory Body and Supreme Court. In addition, it can also be through the pathways of the Case of Dispute over Election Results (Article 156) which is tried by the Constitutional Court. The cancellation process by the two pathways has the potential to cause conflicting decisions on the same object, making it confusing at the execution stage.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adrian E. Rompis dan Abi M. Radjab. (2012). A Comparation on Civil Service Dispute Resolutions: Between Civil Action to State Administrative Court And Administrative Appeal To Civil Service Consideration Board, Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS VOL. 6, No.1, Juni.
Ahmad Siboy, Konstruksi Hukum Pilkada: Jalan Tengah Keadilan Prosedural Dan Substansial Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasi Pilkada Serentak, Depok, Rajawali press
Ahmad Siboy. (2021). Desain Integrasi Lembaga Peradilan Pilkada, Depok, Rajawali Press.
Bayu Dwi Anggono. (2020). Pokok-pokok Pemikiran Penataan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia, Jakarta, Konstitusi Press.
https://kumparan.com/lampunggeh/tiga-pasangan-cawalkot-bandar-lampung-resmi-dapat-nomor-urut-berikut-urutannya-1uGFZxghYej/fullKekuatan-Mengikat-dan-Pelaksanaan-Putusan-MK.pdf (ub.ac.id)
https://regional.kompas.com/read/2021/01/12/18094301/kpu-tasikmalaya-tolak-rekomendasi-bawaslu-untuk-batalkan-petahana?page=all. Diakses 25 Februari 2021 jam. 15.20.
M. Mahrus Ali, et al. (2012). Tafsir Konstitusional Pelanggaran Pemilukada yang Bersifat Sistematis, Terstruktur dan Masif, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 9, Nomor 1, Maret.
Mohammad Agus Maulidi. (2017). Problematika Hukum Implementasi Putusan Final Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Negara Hukum, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum No. 4 Vol. 24 Oktober.
Sekretariat Jenderal Dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2010). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 2015 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota Menjadi Undang-Undang (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5898)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.4946
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 40 timesPDF - 13 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
![Creative Commons License](http://licensebuttons.net/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
![Creative Commons License](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.