The Effectiveness of Corruption Law Enforcement in Providing a Determinant Effect on the Performers

Dian Adriawan

Abstract


The existence of Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, directly or indirectly, is expected to suppress leakage and irregularities in the state's finances and economy. By anticipating these deviations as early and as much as possible, it is hoped that the wheels of the economy and development can be carried out properly. However, ironically, the more intensive efforts to eradicate corruption have not led to a decrease in the number of corruption crimes in Indonesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of criminal sanctions given to defendants of corruption. The research method is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data which includes primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The professionalism of the judge's decision is very decisive in providing a deterrent effect to the perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption so that, only with an effective judge's decision can corruption be stopped or at least reduced. Moreover, the law has very firmly given the threat of the heaviest punishment, namely the death penalty to anyone who commits a criminal act of corruption that is detrimental to state finances, now how judges can implement the existing law through decisions that fulfil a sense of justice.


Keywords


corruption; law enforcement; criminal acts

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Muliadi. (2011). ‘Peran Politik Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan, Adil’, Jurnal Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Yarsi, 2.2 160

Arrista Trimaya. (2013). ‘Peranan Hakim Sebagai Agent of Change Dalam Melakukan Reformasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara’, Jurnal Perundang-Undangan Prodigy, 1.1.

Arya Maheka. (2006). Mengenali Dan Memberantas Korupsi (Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi)

M.Yahya Harahap. (2013). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika)

Mada Apriandi Zuhir. (2020). ‘Kewajiban Internasional Dan Diplomasi Indonesia Terkait Komitmen Anti Korupsi”, Makalah Seminar Diseminasi United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), Diselenggarakan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya Dan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, 11 Juni’, in United Nations Convention Against Corruption

Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo)

Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. (2008). Beberapa Pemikiran Ke Arah Pengembangan Hukum Pidana (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti)

Prianter Jaya Hairi. (2014). ‘Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Terhadap Tindakan Hakim Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Mahkamah Agung’, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 5.1 50

Syaiful Bakhri. (2012). Beban Pembuktian: Dalam Beberapa Praktik Peradilan (Depok: Gramata Publishing)

Wahyu Wiriadinata. (2014). ‘Korupsi Dalam Pencurian Aliran Listrik Dalam Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM RI, 8.3 320

Yenti Garnasih. (2010) ‘Asset Recovery Act Sebagai Strategi Dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi, Dalam Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana’, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 7.4




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5669

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 34 times
PDF - 11 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.