Lecturers’ Feedback on Students’ Reading at Politeknik LP3I Medan

Ramadani Ramadani, Andrysyah Andrysyah, Siska Hasibuan, Asri Sanusi, Doni Efrizah

Abstract


This study dealt lecturers’ feedback on students’ reading at Politeknik LP3I Medan. This study aimed to find out lecturers’ feedback on students’ reading at Politeknik LP3I Medan. This study used the theory from Ellis (2009). Methodology of this study used qualitative research by Miles, Huberman and Saldana (2014), it was interactive method. The collecting data of this study was observation and recording students and lecturers’ utterances on learning process in reading class. The recording was transcribed to find out the data related to the study. The result of this study, there were direct feedback and indirect feedback. There were four process of feedback that implemented in learning process on reading class, they are explicit correction, metalinguistic comment, recast and repetition. Process of feedback was not related to the theory from Ellis (2009). There were six processes of feedback by Ellis (2009). They were explicit correction, metalinguistic comment, recast, repetition, elicitation and clarification request. In this study, researcher did not find two processes of feedback, they were elicitation and clarification request.


Keywords


Feedback; types of feedback; process of feedback; teaching of reading

Full Text:

PDF

References


feedback

Bitchener, J & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquition and writing. USA : Walsworth Publishing Company

Brookhart, S. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. USA: Association for Supervision and Development (ASCD)

Carvalho, C., Santos, J., Conboy, J., & Martins, D. (2014). Teachers’ feedback: exploring differences in students’ perceptions. Elsevier. 159,169-173

Claudia, L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation- ELT Journal. 44 (4)USA: Oxford University Press

Cook, S. (2013. USA ). Providing feedback on student writing: Department of Education AANAPISI Grant. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/

Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. England : Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2014). Exploring language pedogogy Through Second Language Acquisition Research. England : Routledge

Farid, S.,& Samad, A.(2012). Effects of different kind of direct feedback on students’ writing. Elsevier. 66, 232-239.

Gage, N. (2009). A conception of teaching. USA : Springer Science.

Hattie, J & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Sage. 77 (11), 81-112.Retrieved from http://rer.area.net 17/02/2017 .

Hinkle, E (2005). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. London : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hyland, K & Hyland, F (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Jamalinesari, M. (2014). The investigated the effects of teacher-written direct vs. indirect feedback on students’ writing. Elsevier 98,668-674

Kamberi, L. (2013). The significance of teacher feedback in EFL writing for tertiary level foreign language learners. Elsevier 70,1686-1690

Leng. (2013). An analysis of written feedback on ESL students’ writing. Elsevier 123, 389-397.

Liu, Yingliang.(2008). The effect of error feedback in second language writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA Learning & Teaching, 15,65-79. Retrieved from http://w3.coh.arizona.edu/awp/on 01/03/2017 .

Lounis, M. (2010). Students’ response to teachers’ feedback on writing. Constantine: Mentouri University –Dissertation: Unpublished.

Miles, MB, Huberman, A.M, dan Saldana, J. qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods

Moleong, Lexy J.1995. metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Mollestam, E & Hu, L. (2016). Corrective feedback on L2 students’ writing. Dissertation:Published

Nunan. (2003). Practical english language teaching. Boston: Heinle.

on EFL students’ writing.Elsevier. 46, 2590-2595

Panhoo, S.,& Wongwanich, S. (2014). An analysis of teacher feedback for improving teaching quality in primary schools. Elsevier 116, 4124-4130

Sampson, A. (2012). Coded and uncoded error feedback: Effects on Error Frequencies in adult colombian EFL learners’ writing. Elsevier 40, 494-504

Silva, T & Matsuda, P.K. (2010). Practicing theory in second language writing. USA : Parlor Press.

Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publication.

Wen, Y. (2013). Teacher written feedback on L2 student writings. Elsevier 4(2),427-431

Yastibas, G.,& Yastibas, E. (2015). The effect of peer feedback on writing anxiety in Turkish EFL students. Elsevier 199,530-538




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6638

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 55 times
PDF - 12 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.