Alternative Procedure for One-Stage Nostril Reconstruction: A Case Report

Iswinarno D. Saputro, Heri Noviana

Abstract


Closure of nasal defect remains a challenge for surgeons. There are several ways to do nasal reconstruction, including donor site for nasal reconstruction due to its vascularity that is superior to other areas. Methods: This is a case report of a 75-year old male patient with Squamous Cell Carcinoma on his left nostril who underwent wide excision. This action left a 4-cm defect, whilst the nasal septum remained intact. This defect closure was using V-Y advancement full thickness nasolabial flap in one step. This defect closure was using V-Y advancement full thickness nasolabial flap in one step. Results: The defect closure was performed with tum over local (nasobialis) flap from the left side of the nasal cartilage. The superiority of this flap, it is able to be performed bulking, so that closure with turn over local nasolabial flap has been a sole option in nostril reconstruction for decades, which gave very good cosmetic results. After being followed for 1 month after surgery, the flap was viable, the contour was well formed, the scar was minimal, and there was no respiratory disruption. The patient was satisfied by the results. Conclusion: Nasolabial turn over local flap can be used as an option to close a relatively wide nostril


Keywords


turn over local flap; nostril defect; post wide excision; local facial flap; nasolabial flap

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jung HC, Young JK, Hoon K, Sang HN, Young WC. Distribution of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma by facial esthetic unit. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40(4):387-391.

Aksam E, Aksam B, Karaaslan O, Durgun M. Nasolabial flaps for nasal reconstruction: pros and cons. Turk Journ of Plas Surg. 2018;26(4):151-155.

Bilal M, Ullah I, Ehsanullah. Nasolabial flap: a workhorse for reconstruction of nasal ala after tumor resection. JKCD. 2014;5(1):11-15.

Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. The place of nasolabial flap in orofacial reconstruction : a review. Ann Med Surg. 2016;12:79-87.

Najjar T, Meyers AD, Monroe MM, Alam M, Balbak LM, Caputy G, de la Torre JI, DeBacker C, Dryden RM, Duffy MT, Elston DM, et al. What are the recommended margin sizes in surgical excision of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC)? Available at https://www.medscape.com/answers/1965430-85459/what-are-the-recommended-margin-sizes-in-surgical-excision-of-cutaneous-squamous-cell-carcinoma-cscc [Internet] [cited on 24th April 2021]

Young JP, Gyu HK, Jun OK, Woo SR, Kyung SL. Reconstruction of nasal ala and tip following skin cancer resection. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2019;20(6):382-387.

Kaya I, Uslu M, Apaydin F. Defect reconstruction of the nose after surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer: our clinical experience. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;55(3):111-118.

Thorne CH, Chung KC, Gosain AK, Gurtner GC, Mehrara BJ, Rubin JP, Spear SL. Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery seventh edition. Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2014;4(33):361-371

Mathes SJ, Hentz VC. Mathes plastic surgery second edition. Philadelphia : Saunders/Elsevier. 2005.,




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birex.v3i3.2080

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 143 times
PDF - 93 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 

 

Statcounter for Budapest International Research in Exact Sciences (BirEx Journal)