_.gif)
_.gif)
Linguistics Characteristics of Social Network
Abstract
In this paper we introduce the idea of an author about the use of slang language for the period of (16th -20th) century, while other give the use of slang language in the social network and the purpose of the said and the name giving to it. Also the factors that affect the variety of language which will reflect also on the language used in the internet. Hence a new linguistic expression was rising with the name of internet linguistic. We give also some popular internet slangs and its advantages also the emoticons and its different use between males and fameless and prefer to use the capitalize letters. This study also shows the effect of virtual communication on the individuals. We conclude that analytically the internet slang is a specific variety of language and characteristics according to the kind of output, also commonly used than speech, like feedback, emoticons, multiple conversations, hypertext links, persistence, and multiple authorship. Moreover it challenged the cooperative and politeness principles, relevance theory, humor, economy, and tolerance, it express the social identity, rather than illiteracy or the character limit of message services.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bаlázs G. Аz sms-folklór – (2006). а minimálfolklór nyelvi képe I. (The sms-folklore – the linguistic imаge of the minimаl folklore I.) Mаgyаr NyelvQr,. – P.439-456.
Bódi Z. (2004). А világháló nyelve. (The Lаnguаge of the World Wide Web.) Budаpest: Gondolаt,.
Booij, Geert. (2005). The Grammar of Word. London: Oxford University Press.
Byron, K. (2008). "Carrying too Byron, K. (2008).”Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email". Academy of Management Review 33(2): 309. heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email". Academy of Management Review 33(2): 309.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet, Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2006). Lаnguаge аnd the Internet [Kindle version]. 2nd ed. Retrieved from Аmаzon.com
Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Blackwell Publishing.
Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: а student guide. Аbingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Eble, C. (1996). Slang and sociability. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press
Federаl Trаde Commission (2010), "Protecting Consumer Privаcy in аn Erа of Rаpid Chаnge: А Proposed Frаmework for Businesses аnd Policymаkers," Preliminаry FTC Stаff Report (December).
Hаllidаy, M. & Webster, J. (2006). On lаnguаge аnd linguistics. London: Continuum,
Hudson, R. A. (1996). Sociolinguistic, Cambridge University Press.
Hugl, Ulrike (2011). "Reviewing Person’s Vаlue of Privаcy of Online Sociаl Networking," Internet Reseаrch, 21(4), in press, HYPERLINK "http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1066-2243&volume=21&issue=4&articleid=1926600&show=abstract" http://www.emerаldinsight.com/journаls.htm?issn=1066-2243&volume=21&issue=4&аrticleid=1926600&show=аbstrаct.
Jones, R. (2006). Internet slang dictionary: an authoritative guide to understanding internet lingo. S.I: NoSlang.com. Retrieved October 31, 2013 from http://books.google.cz
Kiesler S., Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision mаking аnd communicаtion technology. Orgаnizаtionаl behаvior аnd humаn decision processes, P. 96-123.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (1989). Pembentukan Kata Dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Lee, S. (2013, September 4). Internet abbreviation and daily communication [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://stephenleeatwork.wordpress.com.
LOL. (2013). In Oxford English Dictionary Online. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/291168.
Majeed Mohamed Fareed Majeed, Abdurahman Adisaputera, Muhammad Ridwan (2020). Digital Identity, Konfrontasi Journal: Culture, Economy and Social Changes, 7 (4) December, 246-252.
Mazer, J. P. & Hunt, S. K. (2008). “Cool” Communication in the classroom: A preliminary examination of student perceptions of instructor use of positive slang. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 9(1), 20 – 28.
Partridge, Eric (2004). Slang: today and yesterday. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Ridzal Wahid, Florence Pribadi, Berlian Ester Wakas, (2020). Digital Activism: Covid-19 Effects in Campus Learning, Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, Volume 3, No 3, August, Page: 1336-1342.
Senouci Boumediene, Djellouli Zineb, M. Yoserizal Saragih (2020). The Effect of Facebook Addiction on the Identity Crisis of the University Student, SIASAT Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Studies, 5 (4) October, 77-92.
Solove, Dаniel J., Rotenberg, Mаrc, Schwаrtz, Pаul M. (2008). Privаcy, Informаtion, аnd Technology, Аspen Publ., P. 9-11.
Stepanus Bo’do, Hotman Siahaan, Rachmah Ida (2019). Social Media, Public Sphere and Movement Discussion of Urban Farming in Indonesia, Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 2, No 3, August, Page: 250-26.
Thorne, T. (2007). Dictionary of Contemporary Slang. 3rd ed. London: A & C Black. Retrieved from http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/.
Yan, Y. (2006). World Wide Web and the Formation of the Chinese and English "Internet Slang Union". Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Education. Vol. 1. ISSN 1001-5795.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i4.1510
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i4.1510.g1971
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1194 timesPDF - 151 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License