Development of Mathematics Learning Devices Based on Guided Discovery Learning Models and Focusing on Students’ Mathematical Power at SMP Istiqlal Delitua

Julian A. Hartono, Ida Karnasih, Dian Armanto

Abstract


This developmental research aimed to analyze the validity of learning devices, practicality and effectiveness of the devices, as well as student responses to the use of Guided Discovery learning based learning devices that focusing on Mathematical Power. Data collecting was done by using a validation questionnaire with the observation method, a control problem ability test with mathematical power, and student questionnaire responses to guided discovery-based learning tools. Data analysis used qualitative and quantitative descriptive techniques. Testing of research instruments was carried out at SMP Istiqlal Delitua. The results of the analysis of the validity of the equipment showed that the total equipment was declared valid with an average level of validity of 4, 73 very good criteria. The result of the practicality test showed that the device was stated to be very practical with the proportion of practicality level of 89.94%. To test the effectiveness that the learning device was declared effective with the proportion of effectiveness of 86.49%, with Minimum Completeness Criteria achieved 89.29% of students completed, and 10.17% of students not completed. Learning objectives are achieved with the average level of achievement of goals was 88.13%, and students' responses to the feasibility of the devices getting an average total presentation of 94.9% with very good criteria. The results of the test of the ability of mathematical problems obtained an average value of 79.00 with a good predicate and a standard deviation of 9.76, and the test reliability coefficient of 0.5714 in the moderate category. Thus it can be concluded the Guided Discovery Learning device was valid, practical, and effective, and the student's response to the appropriateness of the device was in very good criteria.

Keywords


mathematical power; learning tools; device development model 4-D thiagarajan; social arithmetic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Borthick, A. Faye & Donald R. Jones (2000). The Motivation for Collaborative Discovery Learning Online and Its Application in an Information Systems Assurance Course, Issues in Accounting Education, 15 (2). [2].

Countryman. 1992. Hakikat Pembelajaran Matematika. Surakarta: Depdiknas

Depdiknas, 2006. Permendiknas Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Depdiknas

Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics: A Vision of mathematical Power and Apreciation for All. www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/.../mathgd_chpt1.pd

Depdiknas. 2006. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Depdiknas

Depdiknas, 2012. Pengembangan Kurikulum 2013, Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Depdiknas, 2015. Revisi Kurikulum 2013, Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Irhamna, Amry, Z., and Syahputra, H. (2020). Contribution of Mathematical Anxiety, Learning Motivation and Self-Confidence to Student’s Mathematical Problem Solving. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (4): 1759-1772.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2011. Survei International PISA. Online. (http://litbang.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/survei-internasional-timss, diakses 10 Agustus 2019.

Kemendikbud 2013. Kurikulum 2013 : Konsep Dasar Pendekatan Saintifik DEPDIKNAS Jakarta.

Kusmaryono, I. 2014. The Importance of Mathematical Power in Mathematics Learning. Paper presented in International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNES), diakses pada 1 Juli 2019 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303459705

(http/p4tkmatematika.org/downloads/ppp/PPP Penemuan-terbimbing.pdf,

National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston. VA: NCTM

National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. 1991. Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reaston. VA: NCTM

National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. 2000. Assessment Standards for School Mathematics. Reston. VA: NCTM

National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. 2000. Teaching Standards for School Mathematics. Reston. VA: NCTM

Parker, R.E. 1995. Mathematical power: Lessons from a classroom. Heinemann

Inc, ABD (1)

Permendikbud. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Nomor 54, Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Permendikbud. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 67, Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Pohan, A.M., Asmin, and Menanti. (2020). The Effect of Problem Based Learning and Learning Motivation of Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Class 5 Students at SDN 0407 Mondang. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (1): 531-539.

Thiagarajan S., Semmel D., & Semmel. M. I. 1974. Intructional Development For Training Teachers Of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. Minneapolis: Central for Innovation on Teaching the Handicaped.

Trianto. 2007. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Trianto, 2011. Mendesain Model-Model Pembelajaran inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Van de Walle, J. A.. 2006. Elementary and Middle School Mathematics. Teaching Developmetally, Sixth Edition. Virgi.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1555

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1555.g2005

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 177 times
PDF - 134 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License