The Development of Critical Thinking Assessment Instruments on Thematic Learning of Life Events in the Fifth Class of Elementary School Students
Abstract
This study aims to: (1) investigate the feasibility level of developing a critical thinking assessment instrument in the fifth grade thematic lesson of state primary school number 107396 Paluh Merbau, (2) find out the level of effectiveness of critical thinking assessment in the fifth grade thematic lessons at the school, and (3) find out the practicality level of the assessment instrument for critical thinking in the fifth grade. The subject in this study is students of class V state primary school number 107396 Paluh Merbau and the object in this study is the developed critical thinking instruments. The data collection instruments used consisted of learning outcomes test and observation. The results show that the product of this critical thinking assessment instrument is validated by three expert evaluation lecturers who have expertise in their fields. The results of the analysis on three aspects of the evaluation expert are the aspect of content feasibility before the revision received a score of 95% with the criteria very feasible. In the construction aspect, it obtains a score of 87.50% with the criteria very feasible and the linguistic aspect obtains a score of 79, 16% with the feasible criteria. The product of critical thinking assessment-based test instruments for mapping primary school student learning outcomes on cognitive competencies is able to facilitate and benefit teachers in conducting assessments. It is in line with the formulation of the problem which states that critical thinking assessment-based test instruments are for mapping student learning outcomes in effective critical thinking used by the teacher in assessing students' critical thinking assessment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aedi, Nur. 2010. Research Instruments for Data Collection Independent Study Materials Educational Research Methods. Jakarta: FIP-UPI.
Arikunto, S. 2006. Basics of Educational Evaluation (Revised Edition). Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
Azwar, S. 2012. Reliability and Validity. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Cook, D.A. and Beckman, T.J., 2006. Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119: 166.e7-166.e16.
Ennis, R. H. Dkk. 2005. Critical Thinking Test. USA: Bright Minds.
Fisher, A. 2009. Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Erlangga. Jakarta.
Khairani, S., Suyanti, R.D., and Saragi, D. (2020). The Influence of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model Collaborative and Learning Motivation Based on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability Science Subjects in Class V State Elementary School 105390 Island Image. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (3): 1581-1590.
Kurniawan, Machful Indra. 2015. Three Educational Center as a Means of Character Education for Elementary School Children. Pedagogia Journal. Vol. 4, No. 1.February.
Mardapi, Djemari, 2008, Technique for Preparation of Test and Non-Test Instruments, Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.
Prasasti, Y. E., Suyono, & Basuki, I. A., 2012. Development of Critical Thinking Instruments through Reading for Elementary School Students. Journal of Education. Vol. 1, No.1: 114-126. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
Purwanto. 2009. Evaluation of Learning Outcomes. Surakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Safitri, R., Syahputra, and Asmin. (2020). The Effect of Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Learning Model and Social Skills on the Critical Thinking Ability in Four Grade Students of SD Negeri 05 Pauh Lubuk Sikaping. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (1): 144-156.
Sudijono, A. 2013. Introduction to educational evaluation.PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sudjana, Nana. 2008. Basics of Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Sugiyono. 2017. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R & D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.
Supriadi. 2012. How to Teach Mathematics for Education of Primary School Teacher 1. Indonesian Education University:
Serang. Uno, Hamzah., Koni, Satria. 2013. Learning Assessment. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wardhani, Junita dwi, Dkk, 2011. Physical, motor and language development, Surakarta: UMS.
Yuberti, and Antomi Saregar. 2017, Introduction to Mathematics and Science Education Research Methodology. Bandar Lampung: Aura.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1664
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1664.g2100
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 175 timesPDF - 136 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License