The Effectiveness of U-Shape Seating Arrangement Strategy for Discussion in Speaking Class
Abstract
This resaerch is focused on the effectiveness of U-Shape seating arrangement strategy for discussion in speaking class at teh first grade students of SLTP Negeri 2 Pematang Raya. The Problem of this research are: 1) How does the teacher implement U-Shape seating arrangement for discussion in speaking class of the first grade students at SLTP Negeri 2 Pematang Raya? ; 2) Is U-Shape seating arrangement effective for discussion in speaking class of the first grade students at SLTP Negeri 2 Pematang Raya? : 3) What are the students’ responses toward U-Shape seating arrangement for discussion? The objective of this research are: 1) To describe implementation of U-Shape seating arrangement for discussion in speaking class of the first grade students at SLTP Negeri 2 Pematang Raya; 2) To analyze the effectiveness of U-Shape seating arrangement for discussion in speaking class of the first grade students at SLTP Negeri 2 Pematang Raya; 3) To know the students’ responses toward U-Shape seating arrangement for discussion. From the data anaysis it can be concluded that : 1) The teacher uses her strategy to implement U-shape seating arrangement for discussion in speaking class of the first grade students at SLTP Negeri 2 Pematang Raya. U-shape seating arrangement is effective for discussion due to some proofs. First, U-shape seating arrangement helps the teacher leading the discussion well. The teacher can clearly give instruction to the students, easily monitor the students, and easily interact with the students during discussion in U-shape seating arrangement on the first day and second day observation; 2) The students show good responses toward U-shape seating arrangement for discussion. 55.56% of number of the students state that they like implementing U-shape seating arrangement for discussion, and 22.22% of number of the student’s state that they like implementing U-shape seating arrangement for discussion very much. Besides, 51.85% of the students state that they feel comfortable with U-shape seating arrangement for discussion, and 33.33% of them state that they feel much comfortable.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anita Woolfolk, Educational Psychology Tenth Edition, USA: Pearson Education, 2007.
Daniel Muijs and David Reynolds, Effective Teaching: Teori dan Aplikasi, Yogyakarrta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008.
Furqonul Azies & Chaedar Alwasih, Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1996.
Geoff Petty, A Practical Guide Teaching Today, United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes Ltd, 2004.
Harmer, Jeremy , How to Teach English, England: Longman Person.1998.
James C. McCorskey, James and McVetta Rod W., “Classroom Seating Arrangements: Instructional Communication Theory versus Student Preferences”. 2007.
J.J. Hasibuan, Dip. Ed, Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 1995.
John W. Santrock, Educational Psycology, United States: Mc Graw Hill, 2006.
Luoma, Sari. Assessing Speaking, United Kingdom:Cambridge University Press. 2003.
Moh. Uzer Usman, Upaya Optimalisasi Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Remaja
M. Joko Sulilo, Gaya Belajar Menjadikan Makin Pintar, Yogyakarta: Pinus Book Publisher, 2006.
Penny, Ur, A Course In Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1996.
Sari, P. A. S., and Sembiring, R.K. (2019). Improving Students’ English Speaking Skill Through the Implementation of Talking Stick Method to the Fifth Grade Students of State Primary School 028226 Binjai. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 2 (4): 507-513.
Syaiful Bahri Djamarah, Guru dan Anak Didik Dalam Interaksi Edukatif, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2005.
Syakur, A. (2020). Improving English Language Speaking Skills Using “Absyak” On-Line Learning Model for Second Semester in Higher Education. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (2): 684-694.
Wallwork , Adrian, Discussion A-Z, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1794
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1794.g2226
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 310 timesPDF - 160 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License