Readability and Lexical Density of Reading Sections of Tenth Grade English Textbooks in Jordan and Sultanate of Oman: A comparative Study

Mohammad Ahmad Bani Amer, Hussein Abdellateef Baarah

Abstract


This research aimed to investigate the reading sections of English textbooks for Tenth grade in Jordan and Sultanate of Oman in terms of their readability and lexical density. To check their readability indices and to assess their lexical density. Data were compiled from reading sections in the textbooks, and quantitatively analyzed through online text analysis software. The findings showed that Jordanian and Omani English textbooks for 10th grade featured the same lexical density and showed that both textbooks include reading sections with low lexical density which indicated that the reading sections were appropriate for 10th grade.  Moreover, the research revealed that, Jordanian English textbook is suitable for 7th grade while Omani English textbook is suitable for 8th grade. It is concluded that Jordanian and Omani English textbooks for 10th grade do not meet the standard requirements of readability indices as they are easier than the expected indices for the target levels.


Keywords


lexical density; readability; textbook; Jordan; Oman

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Rabiah, E. (2020). Lexical measures for testing progress in Hebrew as Arab students’ L2. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1096-1114.

Borras, J., & Llanes, A. (2020). L2 reading and vocabulary development after a short study abroad experience. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(17): 35-55.

Choi, W., & Jeong, H. (2016). Finding an appropriate lexical diversity measurement for a small-sized corpus and its application to a comparative study of L2 learners’ writings. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(21), 13015-13022.

Crossley, S., & Skalicky, S. (2019). Examining lexical development in second language learners: An approximate replication of Salisbury, crossly & McNamara. Language Teaching, 52(3), 385- 405.

Dale, E., &Chall, J. (1948). A formula for predicting readability Instructions. Educational research bulletin, 27(11): 37-54

Dubay, W., (2004). The Principles of Readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact Information.

Ebedy, D. (2020). Developing Lexical Richness among EFL Students: Effect of Morphological Awareness Training on Writing Performance. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 6(2), 45-68.

Fadhillah, Y. (2018). Analyzing Lexical Density of English Reading Texts in Pathway to English Textbook for Senior High School Grade X. Skripsi thesis, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/4822

Fong, F.; De Witt, D., & Leng, H. (2018). The Analysis of cultural elements in Mandarins: A foreign language textbooks from selected Malaysian public higher education institutions. Malaysian online Journal of Educational Sciences. 6(1):66-90

Gray, W., & Leary, E. (1935). What makes a book readable? University of Chicago: U.S.A.

Hidayatillah, N., & Yetti, Z. (2020). The Readability of Students’ Textbook Used in semantic and Pragmatic Course in English Language Education Program of UNP. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1):144-159

Jauss, H. (1982). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Johansson, V. (2008). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: A developmental perspective. Working Papers in Linguistics, 53(2008) 61-79

Nesia, B., & Ginting, S. (2014). Lexical density of English reading text for senior high school. TRANSFORM Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED, 3(2):1-14

Oakland, T., & Lane, H. B. (2004). Language, Reading, and Readability Formulas: Implications for Developing and Adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 4(3): 239-252.

Pikulski, J. (2002). Readability. University of Delaware.

Pratiwi, Y., Farikah, F., &Indriani, L. (2018). An Analysis of Lexical Density and Readability in Reading Text on English Textbook Used by Form 4 Levels Of Secondary School Students In Smkbsb Malaysia. Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics Language and Language Teaching.1 (1):66-75

Prawinanto, A., & Bram, B. (2020). Adjective and noun clause lexical density in English textbook for Senior high school students. Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(2), 255-268.

Richards, J., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.

Sari, D. (2017). Measuring Quality of Reading Materials in English textbook: The Use of Lexical Density Method in Assessing Complexity of Reading Materials of Indonesia’s Curriculum–13 (K13) English textbook. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature 1(2):30-39.

Sarwo, E. (2014). The Effectiveness of Extensive Reading on Reading Comprehension Achievement as Observed from Students’ Motivation.Journal Pendidikan Humaniora. 2 (2):54-58.

Stephens, C. (2000). All about Readability. Retrieved Feb 18, 2021, from http://plainlanguage.com

Syafitri, N., Sada, C., & Sumarni, S. (2014). Analysis Reading Materials on Look Ahead Textbook of Third Grade Students by PT. Erlangen. Journal Pendelikon Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1): 1-8

Syed, N. (2018). English language textbook and development of communicative competence in grade VIII students in public school in Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41 (1): 105-118

Thida, D. (2018). Lexical Density and Readability of Students' Writing. International Journal of Science and Research. 8 (9):893-895.

Vinh, T., & Thomas, D. (2013). Lexical Density and Readability: A Case Study of English Textbooks. Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society. 37 (9):61-71

Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. Applications of linguistics, 23(7):443-452

Yulianto, A. (2019). An Analysis on Readability Level of English Reading Texts for Eighth Grade Students. Journal of English for Academic, 6(1):81-91

Waruwu, N., Sinulingga, J., & Erlita, Y. (2019). Lexical density and readability in English for junior high school VIII textbooks. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 7(4):56-75




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i3.2438

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i3.2438.g2852

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 118 times
PDF - 52 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License