_.gif)
_.gif)
Illocutionary Acts in Joaquin Phoenix’s Acceptance Speeches at Film Awards Ceremonies in 2020: A Pragmatic Study
Abstract
This research aims to identify the types of illocutionary acts, to analyze the functions of illocutionary acts, and to describe the strategies of illocutionary acts used in Joaquin Phoenix’s acceptance speeches at five film awards ceremonies in 2020. The method used in this research is qualitative methodology which, according to Taylor (2016), produces descriptive data—people’s own written or spoken words and observable behavior. The theoretical framework for this research refers to: Searle’s (1979) theory on types of illocutionary acts, Leech’s (1993) theory on functions of illocutionary acts, and Yule’s (1996) theory on strategies of illocutionary acts. Out of 30 analyzed data, the research shows that: there are 11 expressive types (37%), 10 assertive types (33%), 6 directive types (20%), and 3 commissive types (10%); there are 14 convivial functions (47%), 8 collaborative functions (27%), 6 competitive functions (20%), and 2 conflictive functions (6%); there are 14 direct strategies (47%) and 16 indirect strategies (53%).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aprilia, D. 2020. Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Dalam Dialog Serial Televisi "Mind Your Language": Sebuah Tinjauan Pragmatik. Bandung: Universitas Widyatama.
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chimayasari, F. (2016). A Pragmatic Analysis of Illocutionary Act Performed by the Main Characters in Alan Poul’s The Back Up-Plan Movie. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta - Quill, 5 (1), 74-80.
Geukens, S. K. J. (1978). The Distinction between Direct and Indirect Speech Acts: Towards a Surface Approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 261-276.
Justová, V. 2006. Direct and Indirect Speech Acts in English. Brno: Masaryk University.
Khairani, S., Suyanti, R.D., Saragi, D. (2020). The Influence of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model Collaborative and Learning Motivation Based on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability Science Subjects in Class V State Elementary School 105390 Island Image. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (3): 1581-1590.
Kridalaksana, H. 2009. Kamus Linguistik (Edisi ke-4). Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kusumah, C.M. (2019). Sexual Euphemism Expressed in Pop and Hip Hop Lyric Songs: A Pragmatic Study. English Journal Literacy UTama, 3 (2), 109-122.
Leech, G. 1993. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
McNeill, P. & Chapman, S. 2005. Research Methods. New York: Routledge.
Mey, J. L. 1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Moeljadi, D., Sugianto, R., Hendrick, J. S. & Hartono, K., 2016. KBBI V, s.l.: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Nur’aini. (2018). The Relationship between Teacher’s Profession and Teachers' Teaching Ability on (Field Experience Program) PPL's Students of State University of Medan (Unimed) College Year 2005/2006. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol I (4): 99-103.
Rusminto, N. E. 2009. Analisis Wacana Bahasa Indonesia (Buku Ajar). Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidiq, A. J. 2019. Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Pada Cuitan Twitter Publik Figur Internasional: Kajian Pragmatik. Bandung: Universitas Widyatama.
Simatupang, E. (2019). The Illocutionary Acts in the Movie the Death Cure: Pragmatics Study. Journal Sampurasun: Interdisciplinary Studies for Cultural Heritage, 5(2), 80-90.
Syahrin, A. (2018). Culture Repertoire in Expressive Written Language : Study of Hypothesis of Edward Sapir and Benyamin Lee Whorf. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol I (1): 23-28.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. 2016. Introduction to Qualitative Research Method. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Wanna, N.I.d., & Heryono, H. (2020). Types and Functions in Measuring Subjects of E-Commerce E-Mail: A Pragmatic Study. English Journal Literacy UTama, 4 (2), 261-271.
Wijana, I. D. 1996. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.
Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i4.2823
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i4.2823.g3148
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 112 timesPDF - 57 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License