The Application of “Blended Learning-Rigorous Mathematical Thinking” Model to Improve Students’ Spatial Thinking Ability

Makmun Hidayat, Mustadji Mustadji, Bachtiar Saiful Bachri, Bakhrul Khair Amal

Abstract


This research is a quantitative descriptive study that explains the improvement of students' spatial thinking skills after the implementation of the blended learning-rigorous mathematical thinking model, hereinafter referred to as the BL-RMT model. Spatial thinking ability (KBSp) which is measured in this study is related to the mathematics subject in the aspect of geometry. The design of this study used a "Control Group Pretest-Postest Design" with the research sample being class VIII students at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri 2 Sidoarjo. Data collection uses a test technique with an instrument in the form of questions. Data analysis using normalized Gain test (N-Gain Test) andThe t-test was performed using SPSS Independent samples test. The results showed that in the experimental class the mean value of the KBSp pre test is 68.5593 dan the average test post is 83.5593. Tthere is an increase in the average value of 15 digits and if calculated based on the N-Gain formula, a score of 0.477 is obtained in the medium Gain category. While in the control class, the mean of pre-test KBSp was 67.2581 and the mean of post-test was 75.5161. There isan increase in the average value of 8.258 and if calculated based on the N-gain formula, a score of 0.252 is obtained in the low category. Furthermore, based on the results of the t-test on the KBSp pre-test value, the result was 0.375 with a Sig (2-tailed) value of 0.708 > 0.05 ortcount < t table for = 0.05, meaning that there is no difference between the pre-test scores of the experimental class and the control class or the two groups are homogeneous.


Keywords


application; blended learning-rigorous mathematical thinking; thinking ability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carman, J. (2005, August). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. Retrieved August 6, 2020, from https://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~s1000brains/rswork/dokuwiki/media/5_ ingredientsofblended_learning_design.pdf

Casey, M. Beth.; Nuttall, R. L.; Pezaris, E. (2001). Spatial mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics substests using cross national gender-based items. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Volume 32, 29 - 56 Terdapat di http://www.jstor.org /stable/74962.scimag/ads.php? Doi:10.2307%2F749620.

Douglas, A. G. (2000). NCTM: Handbook of researchon mathematic teaching and learning. USA: Mac Millan Library reference.

Hamid, K. A. et.al. (2019). Evaluation of Implementation of Blanded Learning Implementation in Universitas Negeri Medan. Britain International of Linguistics, Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal Vol. 1 (2): 224-231.

Hannafin, R.D.; Marry; Truxaw, P.; Jenniver, R.V.; & Yingjie. L. (2008). Effects of spatial ability and instructional program on geometry achievement. Connecticut: University of Connecticut.

Khairiyyah, A., Mulyono, and Fauzi, K.M.A. (2021). The Learning Effect of Blended Learning Based on Google Class Room and Initial Mathematics on Mathematic Representation and Resilience of Students in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Britain International of Linguistics, Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal Vol. 3 (1): 63-76.

Kinard, J. (2006). Creating rigorous mathematical thinking: a dynamic that drives mathematical and science conceptual development. Journal of Psychology-Erdély Pszichológiai Szemle., 1-25 Tersedia di http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.121.9196&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Kinard, James T; & Kozulin, Alex. (2008). Rigorous mathematical thinking: conceptual formation in the mathematical classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Meltzer, D. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation andconseptual lerning gains in physics: A possible "hidden variable" in diagnostic pretest scores. Ames Lowa 50011: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Lowa Sate University.

National Academy of Science. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington DC: The National Academics Press.

NCTM. (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston VA: NCTM.

Németh, B. (2007). Measurement of the development of spatial. Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae 34, pp. 123-128 Tersedia di https://ami.uni-eszterhazy.hu/uploads/ papers/finalpdf/AMI_34_from123to128.pdf.

Rossett, Allison; & Frazee, Rebecca, Vaughan. (2006). Blended learning opportunities. Washington DC: American Management Association Special Report.

Syakur, A., Sugirin, Widiarni. (2020). The Effectiveness of English Learning Media through Google Classroom in Higher Education. Britain International of Linguistics, Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal Vol. 2 (1): 475-483.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: how to integrate online and traditional learning. London: Kogan Page.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i4.2854

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i4.2854.g3166

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 10 times
PDF - 6 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License