Traditional House Lexical Items of the Batu Bara Malay: An Ecolinguistics Study
Abstract
This study investigated the maintainability of the traditional lexical housing of Batu Bara Malay. This study was kind of ecolinguistics. It was run by applying qualitative research methodology. The finding of this study total number lexical items related to housing in Batu Bara Malay are 210 lexical items. The lexical item is divided into 5 (five) classification. They are Top Parts, there are 37 lexical items consist of 21 items interior and 16 exteriors. Middle Parts, there are 55 lexical items consist of 45 items interior and 10 items exterior. Bottom Parts, there are 13 lexical items consist of 2 items interior and 11 items exterior. Outdoor Items, there are only consist of 27 items exterior, and Extended Items Related to Housing there are 78 items. The Most lexical items are the middle part among all classification. The least one is bottom parts. The new finding in this study, the use of lexical items related to house is at risk.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adawi, R. (2020). Application Systems Available In UNIMED Language Skills Text. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (1): 631-639.
Bahri, S. (2020). The Different Types of Words Meaning in Minangkabau Proverbs: A Stylistics Approach. Budapest nternational Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (2): 695-705.
Bloomfield, Leonard 1933 Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bogdan, Robert C and Biklen, S.K. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education. USA: Ally and Bacon.
Chomsky, Noam 1957 Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2008. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. (Edisi ke-4). Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.
Fellbaum, Christiane 1998b Introduction, in: C. Fellbaum (ed.), 1-20.
Fill, Alwin and Mühlhäusler, P. 2001. The Ecolinguistics Reader Language, Ecology and Environment. London: Continuum.
Haugen, E. 2001. The Ecology of Language. In Alwin, Fill and Peter, Muhlhausler (Eds.), The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment (pg. 57-66). London: Continuum.
Holmes, J. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Longman Publishing.
https://www.meriam-webster.com
JackendofF, Ray 1975 "Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon", Language 51: 639-671.
Junifran, and Rosliani. (2020). The Development of Sociocultural Malay-Based on Folklore Teaching Materials for Class X at SMA N 1 Percut Sei Tuan Deli Serdang. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (4): 1670-1685.
Lawrence, E. 2005. Henderson’s Dictionary of Biology. (13thEd). Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Michael, L. 2015. “Social dimensions of language change”. In C. Bowern and B. Evans (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 484-502.
Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward A Cognitive Semantics (Volume 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thomason, S. G. 2003. “Contact as a Source of Language Change”. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 687-712.
Wendel, John and Patrick Heinrich. 2012. A framework for language endangerment dynamics. The effects of contact and social change on language ecologies and language diversity. InternationalJournal of the Sociology of Language 218: 145–166.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i4.2889
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i4.2889.g3192
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 87 timesPDF - 58 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License