Development of Explanation Text Teaching Materials Based on Needs Analysis of Learning for Junior High School of Class VIII SMP Negeri 28 Medan

Indah Oktasya Sihombing, Malan Lubis, Mutsyuhito Solin, Martua Reynhat Sitanggang Gusar

Abstract


Research and development aims to produce products in the form of explanatory text teaching materials as well as to test the effectiveness of the products that can be used by grade VIII students of SMP Negeri 28 Medan as one of the ways to improve the quality of learning. The results of the validation from material experts in the development of explanatory text teaching materials for students showed that the feasibility of the teaching material components with an average of 88.54 on very good criteria and the feasibility of material substance with an average of 90.91 on very good criteria. Thus, the explanatory text teaching materials developed as a whole are included in the "very good" criteria. The results of module validation by learning design experts concluded that the learning design developed was in the "very good" criteria with a total average percentage of 91.00%. Thus, the feasibility of the design of the explanatory text teaching materials developed can be used by students. The results of the responses made by the Indonesian language teacher concluded that the explanatory text module was included in the "very good" criteria with a total average percentage of 99.26%. So it can be stated that there are differences in learning outcomes between students who use explanatory text teaching materials and those who use textbooks and it can be concluded that the teaching materials developed are effective and suitable for use as learning resources.


Keywords


teaching materials; explanatory text, needs analysis of learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arsani, et al. (2020). Differences in Motivational Orientation in Physical Education in terms of Gender Differences. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (3): 1428-1434.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2008. Avaluasi Program Pendidikan, Pedoman Teoritis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Dick & Carry. 1996. The systematic design of Insstruction (7th Ed.). New Jersey : Pearson.

Kosasih, E. dan Endang Kurniawan. 2018. Jenis-jenis Teks. Bandung : Yrama Widya

Mahsun. 2013. “Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Menggunakan Pendekatan Teks”. Kompas Edu. 27 Februari 2013. Diakses pada tanggal 8 April 2013.

Mindayani, N., Hadi, W., and Ambari, B. (2019). The Development of SOLO Taxonomy Based Assessment Tool on Text of Observation Reports of X Grade Students of Senior High School 1 NA. IX-X. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 2 (4): 371-381.

Rimayanti, Ade Ina dan Jaja. 2018. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Teks Eksplanasi berdasarkan Berita Media Massa Cetak. Cirebon:Unswagati. Vol. 7, No. 2, November 2018.

Triatno, 2007. Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka.

Syakur, A., Zainuddin, H.M., and Hasan, M.A. (2020). Needs Analysis English For Specific Purposes (ESP) For Vocational Pharmacy Students. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3 (2): 724-733.

Ulum, Ömer Gökhan. 2015. A Needs Analysis Study for Preparatory Class ELT Students. Turkey : Adana Science and Technology University. Volume 1│Issue 1│




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1546

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1546.g2000

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 316 times
PDF - 150 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License