_.gif)
_.gif)
Common Science Misconceptions among Junior, Secondary School, and College Freshmen: A Case Study in Dire Dawa City, Ethiopia
Abstract
The aim of this study was to clarify misconceptions about science subjects among middle school, high school, and first-year university students in Dire Dawa City. The sample size was 1,576 first-year middle school and university students in Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. The researchers asked each participant to write responses to open-ended questions about general concepts in biology, chemistry, and physics. The authors use descriptive analysis techniques. These results show that 31.6% of respondents and 49.9% of respondents incorrectly believe that breathing, breathing, and germs are always incorrect concepts. Furthermore, it was found that 33.0% of respondents had a misunderstanding that "seeds and eggs are not living things." 54.6% of respondents had a good understanding that carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen are essential elements for living things, but 26.1% said they did not have a clear understanding of this indicator. Moreover, it was found that 45.9% of respondents did not understand the concept of pressure and violence. 27.9% of respondents did not clearly understand this indicator, while the rest 20.6% understood about pressure. We concluded that the level of common misconceptions about science subjects among teachers, students' families, and students was very high. The government revised existing textbooks, and teachers need to review their teaching methods and work with school leaders to develop intervention mechanisms. Students should have a forum with their families to reflect on what students have learned and discuss science with their children. They are a source of dissemination of existing misconceptions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alters, B. J., and Alters, S. M, 2001, Defending evolution: a guide to the creation/ evolution controversy. Sudbury, y. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Agnes, D., Kaniawati, I., and Danawan, A. (2015). Analysis Descriptive Tes Tiga Tingkat Materi Optika Geometri dan Alat Optik [Descriptive Analysis Three-Tier Test Geometry Optics and Optical Instruments]. Prosiding Symposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains, 597-600
Aydın, H., M. Uşak, 2003, The Importance of the Investigation of Alternative Conceptions in Science Classes: A Theoretical Approach Pamukkale University Journal of Education 1(13), 121–135
Barrass, R., 1984, Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 18(3), 201–206.
Bayuni, T.C., W. Sopandi, A. Sujana, 2018, Identification misconception of primary school teacher education students in changes of matters using a five-tier diagnostic test, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1013, 012086, 1-7
Belo, N. A.H., Driel, J. H. V, & Verloop N. (2010). Teachers’ Beliefs about Making Physics Engaging and Comprehensible for Secondary Students in the Netherlands. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 29‐39). Ankara, Turkey: PegemAkademi.
Berg EVD., 2004, Alternative conceptions in physics and remediation. Philippines: Science and Mathematics Education Institute University of San Carlos.
Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P., &Abell S. (2010). Do Beliefs Change? Investigating Prospective Teachers’ Science Teaching Orientations during an Accelerated Post-baccalaureate Program. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 41‐51). Ankara, Turkey: PegemAkademi.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: PegemA, 6th Edition.
Cleminson, A. (1990). Establishing an epistemological base for science teaching in the light of contemporary notions of the nature of science and of how children learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 429 - 445.
Cochran, W.G., 1977, Sampling Techniques (3rd edition). John Wiley &Sons.
Crawford, BA, Zembal-Saul, C, Munford, D, & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 613–637.
Driver, R, Squires, A, Rushworth, P, & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science. New York, NY: Routledge.
Fisher, KM. (2004). The importance of prior knowledge in college science instruction. In DW Dunal, EL Wright, & JB Day (Eds.), Reform in undergraduate science teaching for the 21st century (pp. 69–83). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Fitzgerald A., Hackling M, & Dawson V. (2010). Beliefs, Knowledge, and Practices of Two Effective Primary Science Teachers. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 53‐58). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Haidar, AH. (1997). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of the conservation of matter and related concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 181–197.
Hilarius, J. D., and Adpriyadi, 2020, Students’ Misconception in Concept of Biology Cel, Anatolian Journal of Education, 5(1), 47-52
Ibrahim, M. 2012. Konsep, Miskonsepsidan Cara Pembelajarannya. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Jarvis, T, Pell, A, & McKeon, F. (2003). Changes in primary teachers’ science knowledge and understanding during a two-year in-service program. Research in Science and Technology Education, 21, 17–42.
Keeley, P. (2012). Misunderstanding Misconceptions. Science Scope, 35(8), 12.
Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 432–448.
Lange K., Kleickmann T., & Moeller K. (2010). Measuring primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in science education with open-ended and multiple-choice items. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 67‐69). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Lawrenz, F. (1986). Misconceptions of physical science concepts among elementary school teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 86, 654–660.
Leaper, C., Farkas, T., & Brown, C. S. (2012). Adolescent Girls’ Experiences and Gender-Related Beliefs in Relation to Their Motivation in Math/Science and English. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 268-282.
Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2010). A mixed methods approach to characterize the beliefs on science teaching and learning of freshman science student teachers from different science teaching domains. In M.F. Taşar& G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 21‐28). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Modell, H, Michael, J, & Wenderoth, MP. (2005). Helping the learner to learn: the role of uncovering misconceptions. American Biology Teacher, 67, 20–26.
Mohapatra, JK, & Bhattacharyya, S. (1989). Pupils, and teachers, induced incorrect generalization and the concept of force. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 429–436.
Morais, M. D. F. (2013). Creativity: Challenges to a Key Concept for the XXI Century. Retrieved from https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/26465
Murdoch, J. (2018). Our Preconceived Notions of Challenging. Early Years Educator, 19(9), 22-24
Novick, S., J. Nussbaum, 1978, Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study Science Education 62(3), 273-281.
Özgür, S., 2013, The Persistence of Misconceptions about the Human Blood Circulatory System among Students in Different Grade Levels, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(2), 255-268
Sanders, WL, Horn, SP. (1994). The Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299–311.
Smith III, J. P., Disessa, A. A., and Roschelle, J., 1994, Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The journal of the learning sciences, 3(2), 115-163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
Taufiq, M. (2012). RemidiasiMiskonsepsiMahasiswaCalon Guru FisikaPadaKonsep Gaya MelaluiPenerapan Model SiklusBelajar (Learning Cycle) 5E, JurnalPendidikan IPA Indonesia. 1(2) 198-203.
Wanderssee, J. H, Mintzes, J. J, & Novak, J. D, 1994, Research in alternative conceptions in science: part II learning. In DL Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, 177–210, New York: Macmillan.
Wood-Robinson, C., 1994. Young people’s ideas about inheritance and evolution. Studies in Science Education, 24, 29–47.
Yates and Marek, 2014, Teachers teaching misconceptions: a study of factors contributing to high school biology students’ acquisition of biological evolution, Yates and Marek Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2014, 7(7), 1-18
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., J.D. Novak, 1994, Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, New York: Simon & Schuster and Prentice Hall International, 177-210
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v7i3.7949
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v7i3.7949.g7824
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 1 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License