Developing Student’s German Language Competencies through Pragmatic Approach in the Classroom for Higher Education
Abstract
The general goal of teaching German as a foreign language is that learners can communicate appropriately in writing and orally in German. But in fact this goal can often not be achieved. Many learners in higher education master the German grammar and vocabulary, but they are unable to use German language that matches the social context, because they do not have much pragmatics competence. Pragmatic approach based on the function of language as a communication tool is a study of language by involving various aspects outside the language that are able to provide meaning. Pragmatic competence constitutes a significant factor in determining the success of communication. In fact, a German language learner in higher education is not only expected to use language and produce utterances which are understandable or grammatically correct, but is also expected to produce utterances which are socioculturally appropriate. However, for students in higher education who learn German as a Foreign Language (Deutsch als Fremdsprache/DaF), the pragmatic competence, which can actually be acquired naturally through social interaction, is quite difficult to acquire due to the limited. On this basis, pragmatics needs to be integrated into German language courses in higher education, which includes pragma linguistics and socio pragmatic. In this regard, this study describes not only the relationship between pragmatics and German as a foreign language, but also this study is an attempt to define its implications in teaching German as foreign language in higher education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2005. On the Role of Formulas in the Acquisition of L2 Pragmatics. Indiana University.
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, und Mahan-Taylor, Rebecca. 2009. “Introduction” in Teaching Pragmatics.
Chen, Yuanshan. 2009. “Learner Perceptions of Instruction in L2 Pragmatics” in English Language Teaching. Vol. 2, No. 4 Desember 2009.
Cohen, Andrew D. 2008. “Teaching and Assesing L2 Pragmatics: What can we expect from learners?” in Language Teaching, 41:2, pp. 213 – 235.
Jerniga, Justin. 2012. “Output and English as a Second Language Pragmatic Development: The Effectiveness of Output-focused Video-based Instruction” in English Language Learning Vol. 5, No. 4, April 2012.
Kasper, G. 1997. Can pragmatic competence be taught? (NetWork #6) [HTML document]. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Purwo, Bambang Kaswanti. 1990. Pragmatik dan Pengajaran Bahasa, Menyibak Kurikulum 1984. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Richards, Jack C., Schmidt, Richard. 2002. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Roever, Carsten. 2009. “Teaching and Testing Pragmatics” in Handbook of Language Teaching. West-Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Limited.
Taguchi, Naoko. 2011. “Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues” in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (2011). 31, 289 – 310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i1.853
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 135 timesPDF - 211 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License